comment
stringlengths 1
9.49k
| context
sequencelengths 0
835
|
|---|---|
>
Then you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure.
If you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is.
Genetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.
Abortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb.
If your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered"
] |
>
You must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community."
] |
>
Yes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious."
] |
>
I think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response.
And that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?
Life and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus."
] |
>
A toddler and a poor person are still surviving on their own. They breathe their own air and eat their own food. A fetus is quite literally draining the energy from the woman carrying it.
Yes, life and rights are a fine line to walk, but you're missing the woman in the situation. If you want to give a fetus rights to life, that means you have to take away the woman's rights. That is the entire issue. The woman is more important at the end of the day. She is aware, she is sentient, she knows she is suffering. A fetus does not care. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus.",
">\n\nI think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response. \nAnd that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?\nLife and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO."
] |
>
A toddler cannot survive on its own, I’m not sure how you even argue that. A baby I’m the womb does take sustenance from the mother, yes. That’s basic knowledge, just like that getting pregnant can result in a pregnancy.
The mother had a choice to sleep with a man, had a choice to make him wear a condom, had a choice to take a pill or any of the other various forms of birth control, etc. Because she chose to do that irresponsibly doesn’t mean she has the right to actively take a life. We need some accountability here.
You started at survival, went to the ability to eat yourself, and ended at sentience. That’s three separate ideas of what constitutes life, all of which could easily be used in places other than abortion to place less worth on an individuals life. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus.",
">\n\nI think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response. \nAnd that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?\nLife and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO.",
">\n\nA toddler and a poor person are still surviving on their own. They breathe their own air and eat their own food. A fetus is quite literally draining the energy from the woman carrying it.\nYes, life and rights are a fine line to walk, but you're missing the woman in the situation. If you want to give a fetus rights to life, that means you have to take away the woman's rights. That is the entire issue. The woman is more important at the end of the day. She is aware, she is sentient, she knows she is suffering. A fetus does not care."
] |
>
I specifically said "breathe and eat on their own." They can function as an individual.
The mother had a choice to sleep with a man
AH! And there it is! It always boils down to this with pro-lifers. Punishment. You think because a woman made a choice you don't like, she should be forced to be pregnant against her will. Because in your books birth control never fails, rape never happens, health issues never appear. It's always because the woman did a naughty thing that makes you feel icky, and you want her to suffer for it.
Have a good day. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus.",
">\n\nI think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response. \nAnd that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?\nLife and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO.",
">\n\nA toddler and a poor person are still surviving on their own. They breathe their own air and eat their own food. A fetus is quite literally draining the energy from the woman carrying it.\nYes, life and rights are a fine line to walk, but you're missing the woman in the situation. If you want to give a fetus rights to life, that means you have to take away the woman's rights. That is the entire issue. The woman is more important at the end of the day. She is aware, she is sentient, she knows she is suffering. A fetus does not care.",
">\n\nA toddler cannot survive on its own, I’m not sure how you even argue that. A baby I’m the womb does take sustenance from the mother, yes. That’s basic knowledge, just like that getting pregnant can result in a pregnancy. \nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man, had a choice to make him wear a condom, had a choice to take a pill or any of the other various forms of birth control, etc. Because she chose to do that irresponsibly doesn’t mean she has the right to actively take a life. We need some accountability here. \nYou started at survival, went to the ability to eat yourself, and ended at sentience. That’s three separate ideas of what constitutes life, all of which could easily be used in places other than abortion to place less worth on an individuals life."
] |
>
Is that a step as in 12 inches, or are we talking Centimeters? How does one measure a "step" when it comes to legislation? How many steps remain? Is it one step of 100? So 99 to go? What does this even mean? My God you people are pissy today. It's a joke. I guess you are one step away from zero sense of humor. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus.",
">\n\nI think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response. \nAnd that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?\nLife and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO.",
">\n\nA toddler and a poor person are still surviving on their own. They breathe their own air and eat their own food. A fetus is quite literally draining the energy from the woman carrying it.\nYes, life and rights are a fine line to walk, but you're missing the woman in the situation. If you want to give a fetus rights to life, that means you have to take away the woman's rights. That is the entire issue. The woman is more important at the end of the day. She is aware, she is sentient, she knows she is suffering. A fetus does not care.",
">\n\nA toddler cannot survive on its own, I’m not sure how you even argue that. A baby I’m the womb does take sustenance from the mother, yes. That’s basic knowledge, just like that getting pregnant can result in a pregnancy. \nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man, had a choice to make him wear a condom, had a choice to take a pill or any of the other various forms of birth control, etc. Because she chose to do that irresponsibly doesn’t mean she has the right to actively take a life. We need some accountability here. \nYou started at survival, went to the ability to eat yourself, and ended at sentience. That’s three separate ideas of what constitutes life, all of which could easily be used in places other than abortion to place less worth on an individuals life.",
">\n\nI specifically said \"breathe and eat on their own.\" They can function as an individual.\n\nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man\n\nAH! And there it is! It always boils down to this with pro-lifers. Punishment. You think because a woman made a choice you don't like, she should be forced to be pregnant against her will. Because in your books birth control never fails, rape never happens, health issues never appear. It's always because the woman did a naughty thing that makes you feel icky, and you want her to suffer for it.\nHave a good day."
] |
>
Its in cm since it’s France and it’s one step out of two , so halfway | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus.",
">\n\nI think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response. \nAnd that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?\nLife and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO.",
">\n\nA toddler and a poor person are still surviving on their own. They breathe their own air and eat their own food. A fetus is quite literally draining the energy from the woman carrying it.\nYes, life and rights are a fine line to walk, but you're missing the woman in the situation. If you want to give a fetus rights to life, that means you have to take away the woman's rights. That is the entire issue. The woman is more important at the end of the day. She is aware, she is sentient, she knows she is suffering. A fetus does not care.",
">\n\nA toddler cannot survive on its own, I’m not sure how you even argue that. A baby I’m the womb does take sustenance from the mother, yes. That’s basic knowledge, just like that getting pregnant can result in a pregnancy. \nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man, had a choice to make him wear a condom, had a choice to take a pill or any of the other various forms of birth control, etc. Because she chose to do that irresponsibly doesn’t mean she has the right to actively take a life. We need some accountability here. \nYou started at survival, went to the ability to eat yourself, and ended at sentience. That’s three separate ideas of what constitutes life, all of which could easily be used in places other than abortion to place less worth on an individuals life.",
">\n\nI specifically said \"breathe and eat on their own.\" They can function as an individual.\n\nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man\n\nAH! And there it is! It always boils down to this with pro-lifers. Punishment. You think because a woman made a choice you don't like, she should be forced to be pregnant against her will. Because in your books birth control never fails, rape never happens, health issues never appear. It's always because the woman did a naughty thing that makes you feel icky, and you want her to suffer for it.\nHave a good day.",
">\n\nIs that a step as in 12 inches, or are we talking Centimeters? How does one measure a \"step\" when it comes to legislation? How many steps remain? Is it one step of 100? So 99 to go? What does this even mean? My God you people are pissy today. It's a joke. I guess you are one step away from zero sense of humor."
] |
>
More like 2 out of 4. The bill passed the Assembly, now it's passed the Senate with an amendment, so now it has to pass the Assembly again, and then it will be put to a national referendum. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus.",
">\n\nI think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response. \nAnd that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?\nLife and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO.",
">\n\nA toddler and a poor person are still surviving on their own. They breathe their own air and eat their own food. A fetus is quite literally draining the energy from the woman carrying it.\nYes, life and rights are a fine line to walk, but you're missing the woman in the situation. If you want to give a fetus rights to life, that means you have to take away the woman's rights. That is the entire issue. The woman is more important at the end of the day. She is aware, she is sentient, she knows she is suffering. A fetus does not care.",
">\n\nA toddler cannot survive on its own, I’m not sure how you even argue that. A baby I’m the womb does take sustenance from the mother, yes. That’s basic knowledge, just like that getting pregnant can result in a pregnancy. \nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man, had a choice to make him wear a condom, had a choice to take a pill or any of the other various forms of birth control, etc. Because she chose to do that irresponsibly doesn’t mean she has the right to actively take a life. We need some accountability here. \nYou started at survival, went to the ability to eat yourself, and ended at sentience. That’s three separate ideas of what constitutes life, all of which could easily be used in places other than abortion to place less worth on an individuals life.",
">\n\nI specifically said \"breathe and eat on their own.\" They can function as an individual.\n\nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man\n\nAH! And there it is! It always boils down to this with pro-lifers. Punishment. You think because a woman made a choice you don't like, she should be forced to be pregnant against her will. Because in your books birth control never fails, rape never happens, health issues never appear. It's always because the woman did a naughty thing that makes you feel icky, and you want her to suffer for it.\nHave a good day.",
">\n\nIs that a step as in 12 inches, or are we talking Centimeters? How does one measure a \"step\" when it comes to legislation? How many steps remain? Is it one step of 100? So 99 to go? What does this even mean? My God you people are pissy today. It's a joke. I guess you are one step away from zero sense of humor.",
">\n\nIts in cm since it’s France and it’s one step out of two , so halfway"
] |
>
They are now calling it a vaccine against babies | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus.",
">\n\nI think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response. \nAnd that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?\nLife and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO.",
">\n\nA toddler and a poor person are still surviving on their own. They breathe their own air and eat their own food. A fetus is quite literally draining the energy from the woman carrying it.\nYes, life and rights are a fine line to walk, but you're missing the woman in the situation. If you want to give a fetus rights to life, that means you have to take away the woman's rights. That is the entire issue. The woman is more important at the end of the day. She is aware, she is sentient, she knows she is suffering. A fetus does not care.",
">\n\nA toddler cannot survive on its own, I’m not sure how you even argue that. A baby I’m the womb does take sustenance from the mother, yes. That’s basic knowledge, just like that getting pregnant can result in a pregnancy. \nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man, had a choice to make him wear a condom, had a choice to take a pill or any of the other various forms of birth control, etc. Because she chose to do that irresponsibly doesn’t mean she has the right to actively take a life. We need some accountability here. \nYou started at survival, went to the ability to eat yourself, and ended at sentience. That’s three separate ideas of what constitutes life, all of which could easily be used in places other than abortion to place less worth on an individuals life.",
">\n\nI specifically said \"breathe and eat on their own.\" They can function as an individual.\n\nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man\n\nAH! And there it is! It always boils down to this with pro-lifers. Punishment. You think because a woman made a choice you don't like, she should be forced to be pregnant against her will. Because in your books birth control never fails, rape never happens, health issues never appear. It's always because the woman did a naughty thing that makes you feel icky, and you want her to suffer for it.\nHave a good day.",
">\n\nIs that a step as in 12 inches, or are we talking Centimeters? How does one measure a \"step\" when it comes to legislation? How many steps remain? Is it one step of 100? So 99 to go? What does this even mean? My God you people are pissy today. It's a joke. I guess you are one step away from zero sense of humor.",
">\n\nIts in cm since it’s France and it’s one step out of two , so halfway",
">\n\nMore like 2 out of 4. The bill passed the Assembly, now it's passed the Senate with an amendment, so now it has to pass the Assembly again, and then it will be put to a national referendum."
] |
>
Or, you know, a human right. | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus.",
">\n\nI think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response. \nAnd that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?\nLife and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO.",
">\n\nA toddler and a poor person are still surviving on their own. They breathe their own air and eat their own food. A fetus is quite literally draining the energy from the woman carrying it.\nYes, life and rights are a fine line to walk, but you're missing the woman in the situation. If you want to give a fetus rights to life, that means you have to take away the woman's rights. That is the entire issue. The woman is more important at the end of the day. She is aware, she is sentient, she knows she is suffering. A fetus does not care.",
">\n\nA toddler cannot survive on its own, I’m not sure how you even argue that. A baby I’m the womb does take sustenance from the mother, yes. That’s basic knowledge, just like that getting pregnant can result in a pregnancy. \nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man, had a choice to make him wear a condom, had a choice to take a pill or any of the other various forms of birth control, etc. Because she chose to do that irresponsibly doesn’t mean she has the right to actively take a life. We need some accountability here. \nYou started at survival, went to the ability to eat yourself, and ended at sentience. That’s three separate ideas of what constitutes life, all of which could easily be used in places other than abortion to place less worth on an individuals life.",
">\n\nI specifically said \"breathe and eat on their own.\" They can function as an individual.\n\nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man\n\nAH! And there it is! It always boils down to this with pro-lifers. Punishment. You think because a woman made a choice you don't like, she should be forced to be pregnant against her will. Because in your books birth control never fails, rape never happens, health issues never appear. It's always because the woman did a naughty thing that makes you feel icky, and you want her to suffer for it.\nHave a good day.",
">\n\nIs that a step as in 12 inches, or are we talking Centimeters? How does one measure a \"step\" when it comes to legislation? How many steps remain? Is it one step of 100? So 99 to go? What does this even mean? My God you people are pissy today. It's a joke. I guess you are one step away from zero sense of humor.",
">\n\nIts in cm since it’s France and it’s one step out of two , so halfway",
">\n\nMore like 2 out of 4. The bill passed the Assembly, now it's passed the Senate with an amendment, so now it has to pass the Assembly again, and then it will be put to a national referendum.",
">\n\nThey are now calling it a vaccine against babies"
] |
> | [
"This should be done at the EU level!\nEveryone needs to have full rights on its own body!",
">\n\nGood luck not getting vetoed by Poland, at least until their next elections.",
">\n\nUnfortunately PiS is more then likely going to win again looking surveys but hey let's hope something will change in next few month.",
">\n\nThere is no alternative to vote for.",
">\n\nThe lesser evil",
">\n\nThere is no lesser evil, you either vote for PiS or KE/whatever Tusks party is called and get your country wrecked.\nHolownia is way too fresh to give him any meaningful political power right now.",
">\n\nThat's the point, no matter who you vote for it's gonna end up badly, you just need to choose bettwen two bads.",
">\n\nIf only the us was so advanced.",
">\n\nYou guys need more strikes",
">\n\nMy state (Texas) made it so if my profession (teacher) strikes, that I lose my professional license and my entire pension.\nEdit: not saying I don't strike. When there are strikes announced, I'm there. But there are a lot of people who are afraid of the consequences. We need the support of everyone - we are barely a democracy here.",
">\n\n..how does that even work ?\n\"I don’t like how things currently are, so I will voice my discontent !\"\n\"Well well well, looks like someone lost kneecaps privileges\"",
">\n\nI’d ultimately prefer unlimited abortion ability over no abortion ability.",
">\n\nYeah, but what did France actually pass?",
">\n\nNothing (yet, hopefully). The title literally says \"to add to the Constitution\" which would make it a \"stronger\" law you can't change unless you change the Constitution.\nRight now abortion is legal in France (until 14 weeks) but the Parlement could change the law anytime (honestly it's never happening under this Parlement and probably only if there's a far-right majority one day). If it's in the Constitution, it can't be changed or overturned as easily.",
">\n\nI’d bet a 12-14 week abortion law would pass in the US. Congress should put it up for a vote",
">\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nSuppose the amendment passes. Does France have a strong judicial system that could prevent implementation of an anti-abortion law, if the law had strong support among French voters?\nJust reading Wikipedia, it appears that amending the French constitution is easier than in America. In America, you need 2/3 of both houses of Congress, plus 3/4 of the state legislatures to pass an amendment. In France you would need is a simple majority in both house of Parliament, followed by a simple majority in public referenda. Is there anything to stop a future Parliament from re-amending the constitution voters turned against abortion rights?\nAs of 2023, support for abortion rights is strong in France. It's possible that in the future, public opinion will turn on abortion. So it can make sense, from an abortion rights perspective, to limit the ability of future Parliaments to restrict abortion.But is this idea, that future democracies will not always respect our rights, a popular one in France? In America, we intentionally limited the scope of democracy through things like \"Congress shall make no law\" amendments. Does France also have an intellectual tradition of distrusting democracy?\n\nI guess what I'm asking is, this the kind of thing that could protect abortion for hundreds of years, the way the American second amendment has protected gun rights for hundreds of years? Or is it more of a symbolic victory, that could easily be overturned if the political winds change?",
">\n\n\nCould someone familiar with France provide context here?\n\nThe context is that in France the support for abortion is so strong (90% in favor), that adding it to the constitution is completely unnecessary.\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets.",
">\n\nYes, the first thing about France, is that the immense majority of people are completely in line with the separation of church and state, so any religious nonsense is never ground for debate in French politics. \n\nIt's just a diversion attempt from domestic troubles, but nobody really cares so people are still in the streets. \n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.",
">\n\n\nVery likely, I never heard anyone having a serious stance vs abortion in France.\n\nMarine Le Pen very briefly tried to go against what she called \"convenience abortions\" but got so much backlash she won't touch it anymore. That should tell you something.\nEven Eric Zemmour, arguably the most far-right-conservative-women-bad candidate France has seen in modern times, said he wouldn't dream of attacking this right.",
">\n\nIn the US they had Supreme Court nominees saying that Roe v Wade was the law of the land and a settled matter... right until they were in a position to overturn it. And in France we've had Bolloré trying to peddle some anti-abortion fuckery on TV (that film that made headlines a few years back). So yeah obviously it's not at all a major issue the way it is in the issue but I wouldn't be 100% complacent about it either.",
">\n\nCan we get that in the U.S., too?\nEdit: Who got offended by this question?",
">\n\nOnly if you donate to your area's democratic nominee and vote blue really hard! One of these days we could get a majority in the House and Senate and have a Democrat president, and it still won't fucking happen.",
">\n\nIn fact we did do that and for 2 years it didn’t happen!",
">\n\nI wouldn't count Manchin and Sinema with Democrats, they prevented the party from doing anything",
">\n\nJust like how our fanatical fascist types call every Republican who somehow knows better than to support our forty-fifth president a RINO, I would honestly call those two DINOs.",
">\n\ni don't understand why this still has to be a discussion to begin with. More often than not, it's a bunch of grey conservative man dictating what women can and cannot do with their own bodies. The cases that are based on religious principles are even more pointless.",
">\n\nI think the point is that they are arguing that it’s not only their body anymore but they’re now carrying someone inside them. I think that a lot of normal people are lost on what the “for” and “against” are arguing for. Does the “for camp” want “abort 1 minute before birth? I don’t think so. Does the against camp want “1 minute after conception”? No, I don’t think so either.\nMost people agree with each other that there is some time after which a seed and egg becomes a child. I’m sure there are people on either far side but if we had a clear view on this than maybe this would not be as much of an issue. Also there is the temptation to change the definition and people don’t love living with a possible sliding scale. Today it’s 12 weeks, next month they might change it to 20 weeks or 4 weeks. If it got “set in stone” that all legislation will be declared nullified the moment it was amended then the discussion would likely be much easier I think.",
">\n\nThe French. Always the most progressive. Good stuff.",
">\n\nIf only the rest of the world would join the 21st century.",
">\n\nDenying life?\nWhat are you talking about?\nA life with disabilities or awful disease is a good life or one worth living?\nWill these pro-life people take care all their lives for those people with disabilities?\nIf the answer is no, why don't mind their own business and take care just about their bodies and their lives?\nThese pro-life people are just pro-bad life or a life in pain.",
">\n\nWrong.\nAsk any pro-lifer and they will tell you a resounding YES!\nWe will take them. We will help the mothers and fathers. We will vote for funding to child care and fatherhood/motherhood.\nYou’d have to actually talk to us to know that though.",
">\n\nThat's bullshit!\nPlease finish with these jokes!\nWe know very well that pro-life don't care about anything than just to push their distorted views on others.",
">\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\nI’m confused because I’ve never met someone in the pro life community that would mirror that statement. So the “We” you refer to must be mistaken, as that’s not part of our movement at all!\nI’d rather incentivize mothers to give birth and help them financially and completely for a few years before I’d ever want someone aborted. \nI’ll take that trade in a heartbeat (no pun intended).",
">\n\n\nAnd you base this off of the panic porn on Reddit and the news???\n\nI'm basing it on the common sense and how geneally the society doesn't care much about its less fortunate members.\nPlus the economy is i shambles with inflation raising to the roof.",
">\n\nIt’s not common sense if it’s not true my friend. \nI’d suggest talking with some pro-life people, you may be surprised at what we would be willing to do if it meant less abortion. \nWe aren’t bad people trying to hold women down and force them to live the handmaidens tale. That’s all panic porn BS, I promise you.",
">\n\nIsn’t it already legal up to 6 weeks?",
">\n\nUpdated law: 14weeks of pregnancy, 16weeks after last periods. \nOriginal one (Law Veil from 1975) was 10weeks",
">\n\n\nAbortions at later stages of pregnancy up until birth are allowed if two physicians certify that the abortion will be done to prevent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman; a risk to the life of the pregnant woman; or that the child will suffer from a particularly severe illness recognized as incurable.\n\nWorth noting, as eg the UK is 0 weeks on the books, but if two physicians sign off, 24wks. In practice this is so routine that the NHS doesn't even mention it on their overviews, I'm not sure how that differs w/ France.",
">\n\nIf the mother's life is at stake or if the foetus presents severe illness there's no limit. Up until de delivery term abortion can be done",
">\n\n0 babies are murdered",
">\n\nThen you have a complete misunderstanding of biology and the abortion procedure. \nIf you believe it’s a right than that’s your prerogative, but be realistic about what it is. \nGenetics and biology say life begins at conception. It is only within the human species that we do not consider conception it’s own individual life.\nAbortion is the procedure or process of ending/terminating a pregnancy that is 100% accomplished through the killing and removal of another individual in the womb. \nIf your argument is that it’s not a baby, you then have to completely redefine what constitutes life. Which would be fine if any pro-abortion person would come up with a logical and scientific definition of what constitutes a human life. To this day, nothing has been presented to the scientific community.",
">\n\nYou must've had a comfortable life. Your worldview is severely, extremely limited if you're arguing against SOMEONE else's bodily autonomy. You also sound like you misunderstand the abortion procedure if you think what they pull out is a fully formed baby. Are you a woman? No? Then stfu, what do you care. Go care for an already alive baby starving in your back alley! Or better yet, go get pregnant yourself, if you think they're so precious.",
">\n\nYes, there's two bodies. But one body cannot survive without forcibly consuming the other body's energy. The body being used without permission is allowed to free itself from that. It's no different than being forced to donate a kidney to a dying man. You are never obligated to give up your bodily autonomy to someone else, including a fetus.",
">\n\nI think CottonRey hit the nail on the head with his response. \nAnd that would mean that “life and rights” only belong to people who can live individually. What about a toddler? What about an elderly individual? A sick individual who’s on life support? Someone on food stamps and welfare surviving off of the energy and resources collected and created by others?\nLife and rights being given based solely off of an individuals ability to survive alone seems like a bad line, too many opportunities for abuse elsewhere and unsupported by science IMO.",
">\n\nA toddler and a poor person are still surviving on their own. They breathe their own air and eat their own food. A fetus is quite literally draining the energy from the woman carrying it.\nYes, life and rights are a fine line to walk, but you're missing the woman in the situation. If you want to give a fetus rights to life, that means you have to take away the woman's rights. That is the entire issue. The woman is more important at the end of the day. She is aware, she is sentient, she knows she is suffering. A fetus does not care.",
">\n\nA toddler cannot survive on its own, I’m not sure how you even argue that. A baby I’m the womb does take sustenance from the mother, yes. That’s basic knowledge, just like that getting pregnant can result in a pregnancy. \nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man, had a choice to make him wear a condom, had a choice to take a pill or any of the other various forms of birth control, etc. Because she chose to do that irresponsibly doesn’t mean she has the right to actively take a life. We need some accountability here. \nYou started at survival, went to the ability to eat yourself, and ended at sentience. That’s three separate ideas of what constitutes life, all of which could easily be used in places other than abortion to place less worth on an individuals life.",
">\n\nI specifically said \"breathe and eat on their own.\" They can function as an individual.\n\nThe mother had a choice to sleep with a man\n\nAH! And there it is! It always boils down to this with pro-lifers. Punishment. You think because a woman made a choice you don't like, she should be forced to be pregnant against her will. Because in your books birth control never fails, rape never happens, health issues never appear. It's always because the woman did a naughty thing that makes you feel icky, and you want her to suffer for it.\nHave a good day.",
">\n\nIs that a step as in 12 inches, or are we talking Centimeters? How does one measure a \"step\" when it comes to legislation? How many steps remain? Is it one step of 100? So 99 to go? What does this even mean? My God you people are pissy today. It's a joke. I guess you are one step away from zero sense of humor.",
">\n\nIts in cm since it’s France and it’s one step out of two , so halfway",
">\n\nMore like 2 out of 4. The bill passed the Assembly, now it's passed the Senate with an amendment, so now it has to pass the Assembly again, and then it will be put to a national referendum.",
">\n\nThey are now calling it a vaccine against babies",
">\n\nOr, you know, a human right."
] |
Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different... | [] |
>
While one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.
The admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.
AoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).
Instead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different..."
] |
>
One of them has a functioning brain. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them."
] |
>
So you love making things up. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain."
] |
>
Saying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up."
] |
>
Well plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up."
] |
>
You're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time? | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class."
] |
>
yeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?"
] |
>
they tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again"
] |
>
The main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose."
] |
>
And he's a sexual predator and human trafficker. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend."
] |
>
Also true. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker."
] |
>
Hunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.
Matt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.
Always projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true."
] |
>
Matt Gaetz: elected official
Hunter Biden: related to an elected official | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence."
] |
>
That's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official"
] |
>
The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids
Going? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em."
] |
>
That was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid."
] |
>
Gaetz is a nepo baby, haha | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP."
] |
>
Matt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha"
] |
>
AOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.
Gaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.
Clearly they are the same. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap."
] |
>
Republicans are anti-youth, its very clear | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same."
] |
>
Tbf Gaetz is pro-youth too… | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear"
] |
>
Seriously, just watch them both speak in committees.
AOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.
Gaetz's standard speech is just "well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?" with a shit-eating grin.
None of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…"
] |
>
Matt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up."
] |
>
And a media darling? He might peddle in "darlings", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old."
] |
>
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)
The admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.
Rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the "Woke mob," China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.
In September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5 | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt."
] |
>
The youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5"
] |
>
AOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead."
] |
>
I think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis."
] |
>
You got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters."
] |
>
But Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often! | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz."
] |
>
Who TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…? | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!"
] |
>
Gaetz is more of an andrew taint. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?"
] |
>
Matt Gaetz is a pedophile. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint."
] |
>
Like Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile."
] |
>
The only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants."
] |
>
And you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies."
] |
>
This is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit."
] |
>
Weird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread."
] |
>
Matt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy."
] |
>
Gaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg."
] |
>
Because Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman."
] |
>
AOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask."
] |
>
Matt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline."
] |
>
I’ve heard Matt Gaetz say things that aren’t dumb as fuck, but he doesn’t say them very often and he says them in very low-profile settings. It’s like he knows saying things aren’t dumb as fuck are bad for your career in the GOP. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year."
] |
>
Is the difference his dog shit opinions? | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year.",
">\n\nI’ve heard Matt Gaetz say things that aren’t dumb as fuck, but he doesn’t say them very often and he says them in very low-profile settings. It’s like he knows saying things aren’t dumb as fuck are bad for your career in the GOP."
] |
>
AOC is really sharp and busted her ass to get her job. Gaetz won because his dad had the gig before. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year.",
">\n\nI’ve heard Matt Gaetz say things that aren’t dumb as fuck, but he doesn’t say them very often and he says them in very low-profile settings. It’s like he knows saying things aren’t dumb as fuck are bad for your career in the GOP.",
">\n\nIs the difference his dog shit opinions?"
] |
>
I always thought that they were trying to make Marjorie 'Jewish Space Lasers' Taylor into the right's AOC by playing up the whole MTG acronym. Of course now that she's been divorced they've lost the third letter and it doesn't work anymore. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year.",
">\n\nI’ve heard Matt Gaetz say things that aren’t dumb as fuck, but he doesn’t say them very often and he says them in very low-profile settings. It’s like he knows saying things aren’t dumb as fuck are bad for your career in the GOP.",
">\n\nIs the difference his dog shit opinions?",
">\n\nAOC is really sharp and busted her ass to get her job. Gaetz won because his dad had the gig before."
] |
>
Gaetz is an extremist and the only reason he’s a media “darling” is because they report on his antics to generate web site clicks due to his idiocy and extremism. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year.",
">\n\nI’ve heard Matt Gaetz say things that aren’t dumb as fuck, but he doesn’t say them very often and he says them in very low-profile settings. It’s like he knows saying things aren’t dumb as fuck are bad for your career in the GOP.",
">\n\nIs the difference his dog shit opinions?",
">\n\nAOC is really sharp and busted her ass to get her job. Gaetz won because his dad had the gig before.",
">\n\nI always thought that they were trying to make Marjorie 'Jewish Space Lasers' Taylor into the right's AOC by playing up the whole MTG acronym. Of course now that she's been divorced they've lost the third letter and it doesn't work anymore."
] |
>
One inspires young boys and young girls to seek a life of service and community outreach so that they can put more good out in to the world. The other rapes them. | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year.",
">\n\nI’ve heard Matt Gaetz say things that aren’t dumb as fuck, but he doesn’t say them very often and he says them in very low-profile settings. It’s like he knows saying things aren’t dumb as fuck are bad for your career in the GOP.",
">\n\nIs the difference his dog shit opinions?",
">\n\nAOC is really sharp and busted her ass to get her job. Gaetz won because his dad had the gig before.",
">\n\nI always thought that they were trying to make Marjorie 'Jewish Space Lasers' Taylor into the right's AOC by playing up the whole MTG acronym. Of course now that she's been divorced they've lost the third letter and it doesn't work anymore.",
">\n\nGaetz is an extremist and the only reason he’s a media “darling” is because they report on his antics to generate web site clicks due to his idiocy and extremism."
] |
>
Welp, the GOP might have a problem getting close to young people, But Gaetz sure doesn't! | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year.",
">\n\nI’ve heard Matt Gaetz say things that aren’t dumb as fuck, but he doesn’t say them very often and he says them in very low-profile settings. It’s like he knows saying things aren’t dumb as fuck are bad for your career in the GOP.",
">\n\nIs the difference his dog shit opinions?",
">\n\nAOC is really sharp and busted her ass to get her job. Gaetz won because his dad had the gig before.",
">\n\nI always thought that they were trying to make Marjorie 'Jewish Space Lasers' Taylor into the right's AOC by playing up the whole MTG acronym. Of course now that she's been divorced they've lost the third letter and it doesn't work anymore.",
">\n\nGaetz is an extremist and the only reason he’s a media “darling” is because they report on his antics to generate web site clicks due to his idiocy and extremism.",
">\n\nOne inspires young boys and young girls to seek a life of service and community outreach so that they can put more good out in to the world. The other rapes them."
] |
>
Gaetz lacks the physical theatricality of AOC's performances...
He needs to start gesturing, more: Stuff like waving his arms around, and wagging his index finger in an exaggerated fashion...learn to strike a pose, Matt... | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year.",
">\n\nI’ve heard Matt Gaetz say things that aren’t dumb as fuck, but he doesn’t say them very often and he says them in very low-profile settings. It’s like he knows saying things aren’t dumb as fuck are bad for your career in the GOP.",
">\n\nIs the difference his dog shit opinions?",
">\n\nAOC is really sharp and busted her ass to get her job. Gaetz won because his dad had the gig before.",
">\n\nI always thought that they were trying to make Marjorie 'Jewish Space Lasers' Taylor into the right's AOC by playing up the whole MTG acronym. Of course now that she's been divorced they've lost the third letter and it doesn't work anymore.",
">\n\nGaetz is an extremist and the only reason he’s a media “darling” is because they report on his antics to generate web site clicks due to his idiocy and extremism.",
">\n\nOne inspires young boys and young girls to seek a life of service and community outreach so that they can put more good out in to the world. The other rapes them.",
">\n\nWelp, the GOP might have a problem getting close to young people, But Gaetz sure doesn't!"
] |
> | [
"Also, their ideas of providing benefits to young women are VERY different...",
">\n\nWhile one can certainly be seen as a populist, it's not Matt Gaetz in the slightest.\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida’s 1st district, Matt Gaetz. Like AOC, Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America. The positioning works for Gaetz: His rhetoric sits comfortably with his constituents, who come from one of the oldest and whitest congressional districts in America. In 2020, Florida had the second-highest percentage of the population over the age of 65, and his district is 71 percent white compared to 59 percent nationally.\n\nAoC is blaming the right people who actually have power, causing the biggest wealth gap in American history. The other is going after the tired strawman woke mob. China can be dealt with smart policy making, same with immigration and only the tiniest fraction of people are affected negatively by cancel culture (if that's the woke mob he's complaining about).\nInstead of generating moral panic about immigrants and liberal college kids, maybe if people like Gaetz spent more time coming up with policies, they would have more young people supporting them.",
">\n\nOne of them has a functioning brain.",
">\n\nSo you love making things up.",
">\n\nSaying matt gaetz and the word “darling,” in the same sentence, is super fucked up.",
">\n\nWell plus Matt Gaetz is a child sex trafficker, while the worst thing AOC has done is being a member of the working class.",
">\n\nYou're just going to totally ignore that she danced that one time?",
">\n\nyeah… she clearly does not put out enough dancing videos , fuck that… she really nailed that one .. didn’t like the second one that much , but the 3. with the protesters was pretty cool again",
">\n\nthey tried the same trick with the finnish prime minister. you can spot bullshit russian propaganda so easily...america hasn't made a big deal about dancing since like...footloose.",
">\n\nThe main difference for me is that AOC is smart, whereas Gaetz is a moron piece-of-shit coke fiend.",
">\n\nAnd he's a sexual predator and human trafficker.",
">\n\nAlso true.",
">\n\nHunter Biden - Does drugs and bangs whores.\nMatt Gaetz - Does drugs and rapes underage girls.\nAlways projection with Republicans, the fact that the DOJ let Matty slide just goes to show how broken the system is when you can rape and pay off an underage girl with Venmo with no consequence.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz: elected official\nHunter Biden: related to an elected official",
">\n\nThat's what's so fucked. The GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids, scumbags the lot of em.",
">\n\n\nThe GOP is going so low they will straight up attack your kids\n\nGoing? I'm old enough to remember the GOP attacking Chelsea Clinton when she was a young kid.",
">\n\nThat was terrible and gross. So perfectly on brand for the GQP.",
">\n\nGaetz is a nepo baby, haha",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is very interested in widening the youth-gap.",
">\n\nAOC is a charming, intelligent, well spoken, passionate champion of the people.\nGaetz is stupid, selfish, and a pedophile who only represents Republicans.\nClearly they are the same.",
">\n\nRepublicans are anti-youth, its very clear",
">\n\nTbf Gaetz is pro-youth too…",
">\n\nSeriously, just watch them both speak in committees.\nAOC speaks with conviction and demonstrates that she has clearly put time and thought and energy into what she's debating.\nGaetz's standard speech is just \"well, what about DEMOCRATS doing the THING? HUH?\" with a shit-eating grin.\nNone of what he says ever has any substance or authenticity. And the Right eats it up.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a millennial? Fuck he looks old.",
">\n\nAnd a media darling? He might peddle in \"darlings\", but I don't think he's the dwelling he was since the gas mask stunt.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe admittedly shitty dancer is the representative from Florida's 1st district, Matt Gaetz.\nRather than follow Ocasio-Cortez in pointing the finger at big business interests and political misinformation as twin ailments of American democracy, Gaetz takes every opportunity to blame the \"Woke mob,\" China, and immigrants for their nefarious designs on America.\nIn September, after Hurricane Ian swept through Florida, causing an estimated $50 billion in damage, Gaetz didn't call for legislation to curb the effects of man-made climate change or try to size up the future needs of the Sunshine State.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Gaetz^#1 young^#2 vote^#3 Florida^#4 political^#5",
">\n\nThe youth vote gap has little to do with AOC individually and more to do with the fact that a majority of young voters are sick of the shitty world they live in and lean progressive left like she does. The GOP knows it will never win the youth vote legitimately so they aim to seize control of education in order to forcibly brainwash them with their ideology instead.",
">\n\nAOC wants to give young people a future whereas Matt Gaetz wants to give them hepatitis.",
">\n\nI think matt gaetz is appealing to people too young to vote. That doesnt help the GOP get more voters.",
">\n\nYou got that backwards. People too young to vote are appealing to Matt Gaetz.",
">\n\nBut Gaetz loves the youth! Quite often!",
">\n\nWho TF is calling Matt Gaetz a media darling…?",
">\n\nGaetz is more of an andrew taint.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is a pedophile.",
">\n\nLike Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Matt Gaetz is something of a populist voice in his own party. But rather than following AOC’s reprimanding big business interests and political misinformation, Gaetz chastises the “woke mob,” China, and immigrants.",
">\n\nThe only benefit of being a republican is getting to be the biggest asshole in the room with no apologies.",
">\n\nAnd you have to be a republican to think that's a benefit.",
">\n\nThis is the fifth or sixth time I've seen them compared in the last day or two, it must be some trope that the right is trying to spread.",
">\n\nWeird you figure with people like Gaetz in the lead Grooming youth to follow would be easy.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz a millennial media darling? You've got to be shitting me. He doesn't hold a candle to AOC. Gaetz is a child molesting sex trafficker that isn't being held accountable for his crimes. Just ask Joel Greenberg.",
">\n\nGaetz is a Pedophile Sex Trafficker being protected by his Father's Money and DOJ. He is pretty much the GOP's everyman.",
">\n\nBecause Matt Gaetz looks like a Richard Nixon mask.",
">\n\nAOC knows how to stream on Twitch ( Among Us ), while Matt only managed 6 viewers and got bombarded with ASCII dick pics after going offline.",
">\n\nMatt Gaetz is upper class twit of the year.",
">\n\nI’ve heard Matt Gaetz say things that aren’t dumb as fuck, but he doesn’t say them very often and he says them in very low-profile settings. It’s like he knows saying things aren’t dumb as fuck are bad for your career in the GOP.",
">\n\nIs the difference his dog shit opinions?",
">\n\nAOC is really sharp and busted her ass to get her job. Gaetz won because his dad had the gig before.",
">\n\nI always thought that they were trying to make Marjorie 'Jewish Space Lasers' Taylor into the right's AOC by playing up the whole MTG acronym. Of course now that she's been divorced they've lost the third letter and it doesn't work anymore.",
">\n\nGaetz is an extremist and the only reason he’s a media “darling” is because they report on his antics to generate web site clicks due to his idiocy and extremism.",
">\n\nOne inspires young boys and young girls to seek a life of service and community outreach so that they can put more good out in to the world. The other rapes them.",
">\n\nWelp, the GOP might have a problem getting close to young people, But Gaetz sure doesn't!",
">\n\nGaetz lacks the physical theatricality of AOC's performances...\nHe needs to start gesturing, more: Stuff like waving his arms around, and wagging his index finger in an exaggerated fashion...learn to strike a pose, Matt..."
] |
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans. | [] |
>
I mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans."
] |
>
Exactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪 | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids."
] |
>
Fun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time? | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪"
] |
>
I didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true! | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?"
] |
>
I mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!"
] |
>
Omg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company."
] |
>
Not really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic"
] |
>
Presumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic."
] |
>
Age is a demographic btw | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket"
] |
>
Ok. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.
But why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels.
There is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.
The real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw"
] |
>
I wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair.
Until your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc). | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to."
] |
>
I’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc)."
] |
>
It's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them."
] |
>
Well there was nothing "incredibly convenient" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted."
] |
>
Because the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders? | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time."
] |
>
Except in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.
But yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?"
] |
>
Meh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable."
] |
>
Right, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults."
] |
>
True | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up."
] |
>
Happy Cake Day, Jan | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue"
] |
>
Happy what? | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan"
] |
>
It’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?"
] |
>
It's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username."
] |
>
And a few to murder. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire."
] |
>
As you do | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire.",
">\n\nAnd a few to murder."
] |
>
As is tradition | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire.",
">\n\nAnd a few to murder.",
">\n\nAs you do"
] |
>
As You Were - LG | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire.",
">\n\nAnd a few to murder.",
">\n\nAs you do",
">\n\nAs is tradition"
] |
>
Considering the children were all horrible can you think of the uproar on what nationality gets what arsehole behaviour. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire.",
">\n\nAnd a few to murder.",
">\n\nAs you do",
">\n\nAs is tradition",
">\n\nAs You Were - LG"
] |
>
I got the impression that Wonka had pretty elaborate plans for the kids, and selected them specifically to teach them lessons? | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire.",
">\n\nAnd a few to murder.",
">\n\nAs you do",
">\n\nAs is tradition",
">\n\nAs You Were - LG",
">\n\nConsidering the children were all horrible can you think of the uproar on what nationality gets what arsehole behaviour."
] |
>
Exactly. He chose Charlie, it was just the final test. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire.",
">\n\nAnd a few to murder.",
">\n\nAs you do",
">\n\nAs is tradition",
">\n\nAs You Were - LG",
">\n\nConsidering the children were all horrible can you think of the uproar on what nationality gets what arsehole behaviour.",
">\n\nI got the impression that Wonka had pretty elaborate plans for the kids, and selected them specifically to teach them lessons?"
] |
>
In the gene wilder version, the candy store salesman admits he was hiding Wonka bars while they were auctioning for extreme prices. Why would a man in the business of selling candy for profit do that? Then, it's not until charlie says he wants to buy something for his grandfather that the candy seller chooses the type of bar for him, and that bar has the golden ticket.
He knew he had it, and was intentionally holding it for somebody who wasn't buying for themselves. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire.",
">\n\nAnd a few to murder.",
">\n\nAs you do",
">\n\nAs is tradition",
">\n\nAs You Were - LG",
">\n\nConsidering the children were all horrible can you think of the uproar on what nationality gets what arsehole behaviour.",
">\n\nI got the impression that Wonka had pretty elaborate plans for the kids, and selected them specifically to teach them lessons?",
">\n\nExactly. He chose Charlie, it was just the final test."
] |
>
Charlie & the chocolate factory Lore | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire.",
">\n\nAnd a few to murder.",
">\n\nAs you do",
">\n\nAs is tradition",
">\n\nAs You Were - LG",
">\n\nConsidering the children were all horrible can you think of the uproar on what nationality gets what arsehole behaviour.",
">\n\nI got the impression that Wonka had pretty elaborate plans for the kids, and selected them specifically to teach them lessons?",
">\n\nExactly. He chose Charlie, it was just the final test.",
">\n\nIn the gene wilder version, the candy store salesman admits he was hiding Wonka bars while they were auctioning for extreme prices. Why would a man in the business of selling candy for profit do that? Then, it's not until charlie says he wants to buy something for his grandfather that the candy seller chooses the type of bar for him, and that bar has the golden ticket. \nHe knew he had it, and was intentionally holding it for somebody who wasn't buying for themselves."
] |
>
Reminds me of how in Boruto, the main ladies of Naruto took a collective pregnancy pact to birth children in the same year. | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.",
">\n\nI mean, one of them was German, and other than that it appeared to be a mix of British and American kids.",
">\n\nExactly. Put some respect on our bilingual king Augustus Gloop’s name OP! 🍫🇩🇪",
">\n\nFun fact! Did you know the actress who played his mother (Save some room for later!) was in a porn right around that time?",
">\n\nI didn't believe you, so I checked. This appears to be true!",
">\n\nI mean Michael Scott tried this and all the tickets went to the same company.",
">\n\nOmg maybe that episode was really just to shine light on the fact that there is a reason that all the tickets wound up going to the same demographic",
">\n\nNot really sure I’d consider Charlie Bucket and Veruca Salt as the same demographic.",
">\n\nPresumably old mate got confused between demographic and age bracket",
">\n\nAge is a demographic btw",
">\n\nOk. In the story, only Augustus Gloop and Mike Teavee are the same age (9), everyone else is a different age.\nBut why is it surprising that the main characters of a Roald Dahl Story are children? That’s kind of the point of all his children’s novels. \nThere is also almost always an element of magic, or at least the unexplained-possibly-paranormal in his books. In the novel, adults around the world searched like crazy for those tickets, but of course Wonka knows children will be the recipients because his factory, and indeed his candies, are made for children, and their imaginations. The tickets themselves were intended for children, never an adult.\nThe real convenience of it all lies in the the book being written for a target audience, and that audience is children… therefore, characters they relate to.",
">\n\nI wasn’t inherently disagreeing with you (I was responding to the person above who assumed you didn’t think age is a demographic), you can narrow the age demographic to whatever you want. I’d consider “children” to be a general age demographic, but if you want to split it up, that’s fair. \nUntil your response, I didn’t think you were referring to their age, but other points of their demographic profile (SES, culture, location, etc).",
">\n\nI’m sorry, I misunderstood! You are right in thinking I wasn’t referring to their age, btw. I agree they all fit an age demographic, but that’s hardly relevant compared to the social statuses Dahl has created for them.",
">\n\nIt's also incredibly convenient that Wonka's creepy-looking henchman was at the right time and place when all of them were discovered. Almost as if they were planted.",
">\n\nWell there was nothing \"incredibly convenient\" about the winners being English speakers. That was about 99% of the UK at the time.",
">\n\nBecause the only place willy wonkas factory shipped to was within the United Kingdoms borders?",
">\n\nExcept in the film (never read the book) it was implied Wonka’s chocolates shipped out all over the world. I mean, Augustus Gloop was Austrian/German.\nBut yeah, the fact that it was all children who got it would be statistically improbable.",
">\n\nMeh, more kids buy candy than adults, and every year there are more kids than adults.",
">\n\nRight, but the candy wasn’t the main prize. You got a lifetime supply of chocolate which could be sold hand over fist, which I’m sure plenty of adults considered in their quest to find the golden tickets. And plus an exclusive tour of the world’s most mysterious and profitable candy company would almost truly be a once in a lifetime event, and you’re telling me some rich celebrity wouldn’t swoop in and offer any one of those children $10mil cash for the golden ticket, just to have the prestige of going to Wonka’s factory? Just doesn’t add up.",
">\n\nTrue",
">\n\nHappy Cake Day, Jan",
">\n\nHappy what?",
">\n\nIt’s your cake day. Hence the little cake icon next to your username.",
">\n\nIt's because the thing was rigged from the start. Willy Wonka had no children of his own, so he was specifically looking for an heir to take over his empire.",
">\n\nAnd a few to murder.",
">\n\nAs you do",
">\n\nAs is tradition",
">\n\nAs You Were - LG",
">\n\nConsidering the children were all horrible can you think of the uproar on what nationality gets what arsehole behaviour.",
">\n\nI got the impression that Wonka had pretty elaborate plans for the kids, and selected them specifically to teach them lessons?",
">\n\nExactly. He chose Charlie, it was just the final test.",
">\n\nIn the gene wilder version, the candy store salesman admits he was hiding Wonka bars while they were auctioning for extreme prices. Why would a man in the business of selling candy for profit do that? Then, it's not until charlie says he wants to buy something for his grandfather that the candy seller chooses the type of bar for him, and that bar has the golden ticket. \nHe knew he had it, and was intentionally holding it for somebody who wasn't buying for themselves.",
">\n\nCharlie & the chocolate factory Lore"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.