Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset3

like 0

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful." ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird." ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does." ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted." ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met." ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met.", ">\n\nThis is actually pretty cute! They sound like they are giggling." ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met.", ">\n\nThis is actually pretty cute! They sound like they are giggling.", ">\n\nYea they’re pretty cool. Most of them look like they’re wearing shoes due to fur color around their paws." ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met.", ">\n\nThis is actually pretty cute! They sound like they are giggling.", ">\n\nYea they’re pretty cool. Most of them look like they’re wearing shoes due to fur color around their paws.", ">\n\nI saw an episode of a true crime show where the crime was solved literally by the parrot mimicking the victim dying. The parrot's owner was murdered in her home and when investigators showed up at the home, the parrot was crying and screaming like a human, begging \"Ahhh NOOO, don't fcking shoot!\" and ever since then I have hated talking parrots. I cried so hard that night because it terrified me to my core. It is the creepiest shit I have ever heard in my life. Animals should not ever sound like humans. Lmao it's scary as hell. The only other animal things that have creeped me out as much as that stupid parrot thing was this one video of a cat barking like a dog, and footage of a hunting fox making a sound like a screaming woman." ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met.", ">\n\nThis is actually pretty cute! They sound like they are giggling.", ">\n\nYea they’re pretty cool. Most of them look like they’re wearing shoes due to fur color around their paws.", ">\n\nI saw an episode of a true crime show where the crime was solved literally by the parrot mimicking the victim dying. The parrot's owner was murdered in her home and when investigators showed up at the home, the parrot was crying and screaming like a human, begging \"Ahhh NOOO, don't fcking shoot!\" and ever since then I have hated talking parrots. I cried so hard that night because it terrified me to my core. It is the creepiest shit I have ever heard in my life. Animals should not ever sound like humans. Lmao it's scary as hell. The only other animal things that have creeped me out as much as that stupid parrot thing was this one video of a cat barking like a dog, and footage of a hunting fox making a sound like a screaming woman.", ">\n\nI've heard that cougars mimic the sound of crying babies. That's pretty messed up too. \nThe parrot reenacting a murder definitely takes the cake though." ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met.", ">\n\nThis is actually pretty cute! They sound like they are giggling.", ">\n\nYea they’re pretty cool. Most of them look like they’re wearing shoes due to fur color around their paws.", ">\n\nI saw an episode of a true crime show where the crime was solved literally by the parrot mimicking the victim dying. The parrot's owner was murdered in her home and when investigators showed up at the home, the parrot was crying and screaming like a human, begging \"Ahhh NOOO, don't fcking shoot!\" and ever since then I have hated talking parrots. I cried so hard that night because it terrified me to my core. It is the creepiest shit I have ever heard in my life. Animals should not ever sound like humans. Lmao it's scary as hell. The only other animal things that have creeped me out as much as that stupid parrot thing was this one video of a cat barking like a dog, and footage of a hunting fox making a sound like a screaming woman.", ">\n\nI've heard that cougars mimic the sound of crying babies. That's pretty messed up too. \nThe parrot reenacting a murder definitely takes the cake though.", ">\n\nMy flock and I have a bone to pick with you lmao! \nYeah, my African Grey can mimic a select few words (hello, oh boy, whacha doin?), And if he hears my dad laugh he laughs right back in the same voice. He doesn't sound necessarily \"human\", I can tell it's him, but he's smart for sure!\nMy cockatiel just whistles, and he has his own unique sequence he will do obnoxiously in repeat while he follows my budgie around (his female companion passed away so he's on to the budgie lol)\nMy conure doesn't actually say words, he makes sounds that sound like phrases. He can say \"Hi squeaky bird\" but it's just vocalizations, not actual \"words\". He also says \"want some\" whenever I have a drink or food. Overall though it's mainly different clicks, whistles and screeches lol.\nMy budgie: can mimic all three birds and will regularly go off on a 10 minute long cycling of all the sounds non stop, basically communicating with everybody lol" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met.", ">\n\nThis is actually pretty cute! They sound like they are giggling.", ">\n\nYea they’re pretty cool. Most of them look like they’re wearing shoes due to fur color around their paws.", ">\n\nI saw an episode of a true crime show where the crime was solved literally by the parrot mimicking the victim dying. The parrot's owner was murdered in her home and when investigators showed up at the home, the parrot was crying and screaming like a human, begging \"Ahhh NOOO, don't fcking shoot!\" and ever since then I have hated talking parrots. I cried so hard that night because it terrified me to my core. It is the creepiest shit I have ever heard in my life. Animals should not ever sound like humans. Lmao it's scary as hell. The only other animal things that have creeped me out as much as that stupid parrot thing was this one video of a cat barking like a dog, and footage of a hunting fox making a sound like a screaming woman.", ">\n\nI've heard that cougars mimic the sound of crying babies. That's pretty messed up too. \nThe parrot reenacting a murder definitely takes the cake though.", ">\n\nMy flock and I have a bone to pick with you lmao! \nYeah, my African Grey can mimic a select few words (hello, oh boy, whacha doin?), And if he hears my dad laugh he laughs right back in the same voice. He doesn't sound necessarily \"human\", I can tell it's him, but he's smart for sure!\nMy cockatiel just whistles, and he has his own unique sequence he will do obnoxiously in repeat while he follows my budgie around (his female companion passed away so he's on to the budgie lol)\nMy conure doesn't actually say words, he makes sounds that sound like phrases. He can say \"Hi squeaky bird\" but it's just vocalizations, not actual \"words\". He also says \"want some\" whenever I have a drink or food. Overall though it's mainly different clicks, whistles and screeches lol.\nMy budgie: can mimic all three birds and will regularly go off on a 10 minute long cycling of all the sounds non stop, basically communicating with everybody lol", ">\n\nWow, you have a chatty crew!" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met.", ">\n\nThis is actually pretty cute! They sound like they are giggling.", ">\n\nYea they’re pretty cool. Most of them look like they’re wearing shoes due to fur color around their paws.", ">\n\nI saw an episode of a true crime show where the crime was solved literally by the parrot mimicking the victim dying. The parrot's owner was murdered in her home and when investigators showed up at the home, the parrot was crying and screaming like a human, begging \"Ahhh NOOO, don't fcking shoot!\" and ever since then I have hated talking parrots. I cried so hard that night because it terrified me to my core. It is the creepiest shit I have ever heard in my life. Animals should not ever sound like humans. Lmao it's scary as hell. The only other animal things that have creeped me out as much as that stupid parrot thing was this one video of a cat barking like a dog, and footage of a hunting fox making a sound like a screaming woman.", ">\n\nI've heard that cougars mimic the sound of crying babies. That's pretty messed up too. \nThe parrot reenacting a murder definitely takes the cake though.", ">\n\nMy flock and I have a bone to pick with you lmao! \nYeah, my African Grey can mimic a select few words (hello, oh boy, whacha doin?), And if he hears my dad laugh he laughs right back in the same voice. He doesn't sound necessarily \"human\", I can tell it's him, but he's smart for sure!\nMy cockatiel just whistles, and he has his own unique sequence he will do obnoxiously in repeat while he follows my budgie around (his female companion passed away so he's on to the budgie lol)\nMy conure doesn't actually say words, he makes sounds that sound like phrases. He can say \"Hi squeaky bird\" but it's just vocalizations, not actual \"words\". He also says \"want some\" whenever I have a drink or food. Overall though it's mainly different clicks, whistles and screeches lol.\nMy budgie: can mimic all three birds and will regularly go off on a 10 minute long cycling of all the sounds non stop, basically communicating with everybody lol", ">\n\nWow, you have a chatty crew!", ">\n\nMy parakeet can talk.(mimic) and he switches from English to Japanese … very very funny not creepy" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met.", ">\n\nThis is actually pretty cute! They sound like they are giggling.", ">\n\nYea they’re pretty cool. Most of them look like they’re wearing shoes due to fur color around their paws.", ">\n\nI saw an episode of a true crime show where the crime was solved literally by the parrot mimicking the victim dying. The parrot's owner was murdered in her home and when investigators showed up at the home, the parrot was crying and screaming like a human, begging \"Ahhh NOOO, don't fcking shoot!\" and ever since then I have hated talking parrots. I cried so hard that night because it terrified me to my core. It is the creepiest shit I have ever heard in my life. Animals should not ever sound like humans. Lmao it's scary as hell. The only other animal things that have creeped me out as much as that stupid parrot thing was this one video of a cat barking like a dog, and footage of a hunting fox making a sound like a screaming woman.", ">\n\nI've heard that cougars mimic the sound of crying babies. That's pretty messed up too. \nThe parrot reenacting a murder definitely takes the cake though.", ">\n\nMy flock and I have a bone to pick with you lmao! \nYeah, my African Grey can mimic a select few words (hello, oh boy, whacha doin?), And if he hears my dad laugh he laughs right back in the same voice. He doesn't sound necessarily \"human\", I can tell it's him, but he's smart for sure!\nMy cockatiel just whistles, and he has his own unique sequence he will do obnoxiously in repeat while he follows my budgie around (his female companion passed away so he's on to the budgie lol)\nMy conure doesn't actually say words, he makes sounds that sound like phrases. He can say \"Hi squeaky bird\" but it's just vocalizations, not actual \"words\". He also says \"want some\" whenever I have a drink or food. Overall though it's mainly different clicks, whistles and screeches lol.\nMy budgie: can mimic all three birds and will regularly go off on a 10 minute long cycling of all the sounds non stop, basically communicating with everybody lol", ">\n\nWow, you have a chatty crew!", ">\n\nMy parakeet can talk.(mimic) and he switches from English to Japanese … very very funny not creepy", ">\n\nI know it almost makes me feel bad to eat them s/" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol", ">\n\nIm more creeped out by crows, ravens, and vultures. Is there a reason they are symbols of death and bad omens?", ">\n\nVultures don’t talk though at least lol", ">\n\nI feel this. I was at a zoo once and was casually walking away from a ravens enclosure when it just ominously whispered \"Papaya....\"Never said another word.\"", ">\n\nParrots are evil creatures they will just gouge out your flesh randomly for no reason and then scream profanity at you for hours. Yet they live for hundreds of years which to me is just to many they must of sold their souls to the devil or something to live that long. Literal hell spawn but damn are they beautiful.", ">\n\nMy neighbour has a parrot and the only thing it can say is “oh my god. Help! Somebody help.” \nI hate that damn bird.", ">\n\nThat is absolutely horrific! And you know that asshole neighbor intentionally trained his bird to say that 🙈😂", ">\n\nThats what I don’t know. I live in a Spanish speaking country and my neighbour doesn’t speak English. But the parrot does.", ">\n\nI would hope it’s coming from the tv or something. But there is a chance your neighbor’s house is haunted.", ">\n\nNo haha it’s The parrot for sure. I witnessed it when I went to introduce myself when I moved in. Freaks me out every time though thats for sure", ">\n\nI meant the parrot either picked it up from the tv or a ghost 👻", ">\n\nOh haha my bad! yeah maybe that’s totally possible or it’s been adopted and it’s original owners spoke English. That’s usually what I lean towards", ">\n\nDefinitely agree. Have you seen the bird who was a witness in a murder trial?", ">\n\nThat’s a special case I think it’s hilarious and cool when birds talk especially those videos where you hear birds swearing they’re so funny", ">\n\nI’ve actually never heard of this phobia before. Does it also apply to goats/foxes?", ">\n\nScreaming goats: 10/10\nTalking foxes: I would probably cry", ">\n\nGrab a box of kleenex, but you probably won’t need it. They don’t sound like anyone I’ve ever met.", ">\n\nThis is actually pretty cute! They sound like they are giggling.", ">\n\nYea they’re pretty cool. Most of them look like they’re wearing shoes due to fur color around their paws.", ">\n\nI saw an episode of a true crime show where the crime was solved literally by the parrot mimicking the victim dying. The parrot's owner was murdered in her home and when investigators showed up at the home, the parrot was crying and screaming like a human, begging \"Ahhh NOOO, don't fcking shoot!\" and ever since then I have hated talking parrots. I cried so hard that night because it terrified me to my core. It is the creepiest shit I have ever heard in my life. Animals should not ever sound like humans. Lmao it's scary as hell. The only other animal things that have creeped me out as much as that stupid parrot thing was this one video of a cat barking like a dog, and footage of a hunting fox making a sound like a screaming woman.", ">\n\nI've heard that cougars mimic the sound of crying babies. That's pretty messed up too. \nThe parrot reenacting a murder definitely takes the cake though.", ">\n\nMy flock and I have a bone to pick with you lmao! \nYeah, my African Grey can mimic a select few words (hello, oh boy, whacha doin?), And if he hears my dad laugh he laughs right back in the same voice. He doesn't sound necessarily \"human\", I can tell it's him, but he's smart for sure!\nMy cockatiel just whistles, and he has his own unique sequence he will do obnoxiously in repeat while he follows my budgie around (his female companion passed away so he's on to the budgie lol)\nMy conure doesn't actually say words, he makes sounds that sound like phrases. He can say \"Hi squeaky bird\" but it's just vocalizations, not actual \"words\". He also says \"want some\" whenever I have a drink or food. Overall though it's mainly different clicks, whistles and screeches lol.\nMy budgie: can mimic all three birds and will regularly go off on a 10 minute long cycling of all the sounds non stop, basically communicating with everybody lol", ">\n\nWow, you have a chatty crew!", ">\n\nMy parakeet can talk.(mimic) and he switches from English to Japanese … very very funny not creepy", ">\n\nI know it almost makes me feel bad to eat them s/", ">\n\nThat’s chickens though not parrots very different lol!" ]

[]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?" ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage" ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally." ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting" ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame." ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her." ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush." ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush.", ">\n\nThe likelihood that Person C wasn't flirting or otherwise sabotaging the relationship at least in some minor fashion on a subconcious level is pretty low. You don't just stand around pining after someone, hoping and praying they break up with their SO and not have that spill over into your behavior.\nPerson C should distance themselves if they actually respect the relationship or be honest about their feelings to that Person A can set whatever boundaries they deem appropriate." ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush.", ">\n\nThe likelihood that Person C wasn't flirting or otherwise sabotaging the relationship at least in some minor fashion on a subconcious level is pretty low. You don't just stand around pining after someone, hoping and praying they break up with their SO and not have that spill over into your behavior.\nPerson C should distance themselves if they actually respect the relationship or be honest about their feelings to that Person A can set whatever boundaries they deem appropriate.", ">\n\nYes then even if Person C distances themselves but still decides to wait- then there's nothing wrong with it" ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush.", ">\n\nThe likelihood that Person C wasn't flirting or otherwise sabotaging the relationship at least in some minor fashion on a subconcious level is pretty low. You don't just stand around pining after someone, hoping and praying they break up with their SO and not have that spill over into your behavior.\nPerson C should distance themselves if they actually respect the relationship or be honest about their feelings to that Person A can set whatever boundaries they deem appropriate.", ">\n\nYes then even if Person C distances themselves but still decides to wait- then there's nothing wrong with it", ">\n\nI mean, it's morally questionable to be standing around hoping someone else's relationship fails and says nothing positive about Person C as an individual.\nLike sure, as long as Person C distanced themselves and therefore wasn't really around Person A anyways then they're not to blame for any break up. But \"didn't help break a couple up\" is a pretty low bar to set for being a good person." ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush.", ">\n\nThe likelihood that Person C wasn't flirting or otherwise sabotaging the relationship at least in some minor fashion on a subconcious level is pretty low. You don't just stand around pining after someone, hoping and praying they break up with their SO and not have that spill over into your behavior.\nPerson C should distance themselves if they actually respect the relationship or be honest about their feelings to that Person A can set whatever boundaries they deem appropriate.", ">\n\nYes then even if Person C distances themselves but still decides to wait- then there's nothing wrong with it", ">\n\nI mean, it's morally questionable to be standing around hoping someone else's relationship fails and says nothing positive about Person C as an individual.\nLike sure, as long as Person C distanced themselves and therefore wasn't really around Person A anyways then they're not to blame for any break up. But \"didn't help break a couple up\" is a pretty low bar to set for being a good person.", ">\n\nOkay, I’ll bite - I disagree.\nIt’s healthier for everyone (including C) if person C does their own thing. There’s a big difference between ‘if we’re ever both single at the same time, I’ll shoot my shot’ and ‘I am waiting and hoping that A becomes single.’" ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush.", ">\n\nThe likelihood that Person C wasn't flirting or otherwise sabotaging the relationship at least in some minor fashion on a subconcious level is pretty low. You don't just stand around pining after someone, hoping and praying they break up with their SO and not have that spill over into your behavior.\nPerson C should distance themselves if they actually respect the relationship or be honest about their feelings to that Person A can set whatever boundaries they deem appropriate.", ">\n\nYes then even if Person C distances themselves but still decides to wait- then there's nothing wrong with it", ">\n\nI mean, it's morally questionable to be standing around hoping someone else's relationship fails and says nothing positive about Person C as an individual.\nLike sure, as long as Person C distanced themselves and therefore wasn't really around Person A anyways then they're not to blame for any break up. But \"didn't help break a couple up\" is a pretty low bar to set for being a good person.", ">\n\nOkay, I’ll bite - I disagree.\nIt’s healthier for everyone (including C) if person C does their own thing. There’s a big difference between ‘if we’re ever both single at the same time, I’ll shoot my shot’ and ‘I am waiting and hoping that A becomes single.’", ">\n\nI mean sure, but its a bit stupid. Theres no thing that says A & B will break up or that A will like person C and hook up or whatever next.\nIts like friendzoning, it is a thing, its not bad--people can and do develop feelings for their friend all the time, hell people fuck their coworkers despite the advice just because they work and spend a lot of time together and shit just starts going that way; but you have to know boundaries and how to control your feelings and have expectations about it" ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush.", ">\n\nThe likelihood that Person C wasn't flirting or otherwise sabotaging the relationship at least in some minor fashion on a subconcious level is pretty low. You don't just stand around pining after someone, hoping and praying they break up with their SO and not have that spill over into your behavior.\nPerson C should distance themselves if they actually respect the relationship or be honest about their feelings to that Person A can set whatever boundaries they deem appropriate.", ">\n\nYes then even if Person C distances themselves but still decides to wait- then there's nothing wrong with it", ">\n\nI mean, it's morally questionable to be standing around hoping someone else's relationship fails and says nothing positive about Person C as an individual.\nLike sure, as long as Person C distanced themselves and therefore wasn't really around Person A anyways then they're not to blame for any break up. But \"didn't help break a couple up\" is a pretty low bar to set for being a good person.", ">\n\nOkay, I’ll bite - I disagree.\nIt’s healthier for everyone (including C) if person C does their own thing. There’s a big difference between ‘if we’re ever both single at the same time, I’ll shoot my shot’ and ‘I am waiting and hoping that A becomes single.’", ">\n\nI mean sure, but its a bit stupid. Theres no thing that says A & B will break up or that A will like person C and hook up or whatever next.\nIts like friendzoning, it is a thing, its not bad--people can and do develop feelings for their friend all the time, hell people fuck their coworkers despite the advice just because they work and spend a lot of time together and shit just starts going that way; but you have to know boundaries and how to control your feelings and have expectations about it", ">\n\nWaiting is bad, keeping your options open is not.\nYou seem to be conflating the two in my opinion." ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush.", ">\n\nThe likelihood that Person C wasn't flirting or otherwise sabotaging the relationship at least in some minor fashion on a subconcious level is pretty low. You don't just stand around pining after someone, hoping and praying they break up with their SO and not have that spill over into your behavior.\nPerson C should distance themselves if they actually respect the relationship or be honest about their feelings to that Person A can set whatever boundaries they deem appropriate.", ">\n\nYes then even if Person C distances themselves but still decides to wait- then there's nothing wrong with it", ">\n\nI mean, it's morally questionable to be standing around hoping someone else's relationship fails and says nothing positive about Person C as an individual.\nLike sure, as long as Person C distanced themselves and therefore wasn't really around Person A anyways then they're not to blame for any break up. But \"didn't help break a couple up\" is a pretty low bar to set for being a good person.", ">\n\nOkay, I’ll bite - I disagree.\nIt’s healthier for everyone (including C) if person C does their own thing. There’s a big difference between ‘if we’re ever both single at the same time, I’ll shoot my shot’ and ‘I am waiting and hoping that A becomes single.’", ">\n\nI mean sure, but its a bit stupid. Theres no thing that says A & B will break up or that A will like person C and hook up or whatever next.\nIts like friendzoning, it is a thing, its not bad--people can and do develop feelings for their friend all the time, hell people fuck their coworkers despite the advice just because they work and spend a lot of time together and shit just starts going that way; but you have to know boundaries and how to control your feelings and have expectations about it", ">\n\nWaiting is bad, keeping your options open is not.\nYou seem to be conflating the two in my opinion.", ">\n\nHow so?" ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush.", ">\n\nThe likelihood that Person C wasn't flirting or otherwise sabotaging the relationship at least in some minor fashion on a subconcious level is pretty low. You don't just stand around pining after someone, hoping and praying they break up with their SO and not have that spill over into your behavior.\nPerson C should distance themselves if they actually respect the relationship or be honest about their feelings to that Person A can set whatever boundaries they deem appropriate.", ">\n\nYes then even if Person C distances themselves but still decides to wait- then there's nothing wrong with it", ">\n\nI mean, it's morally questionable to be standing around hoping someone else's relationship fails and says nothing positive about Person C as an individual.\nLike sure, as long as Person C distanced themselves and therefore wasn't really around Person A anyways then they're not to blame for any break up. But \"didn't help break a couple up\" is a pretty low bar to set for being a good person.", ">\n\nOkay, I’ll bite - I disagree.\nIt’s healthier for everyone (including C) if person C does their own thing. There’s a big difference between ‘if we’re ever both single at the same time, I’ll shoot my shot’ and ‘I am waiting and hoping that A becomes single.’", ">\n\nI mean sure, but its a bit stupid. Theres no thing that says A & B will break up or that A will like person C and hook up or whatever next.\nIts like friendzoning, it is a thing, its not bad--people can and do develop feelings for their friend all the time, hell people fuck their coworkers despite the advice just because they work and spend a lot of time together and shit just starts going that way; but you have to know boundaries and how to control your feelings and have expectations about it", ">\n\nWaiting is bad, keeping your options open is not.\nYou seem to be conflating the two in my opinion.", ">\n\nHow so?", ">\n\nWaiting implies you are not pursuing other relationships. You are obsessed, in an unhealthy way about someone who is not available and wants a relationship with them.\nKeeping your options open on the other hand, you still would love a chance to pursue a relationship with the individual, but you aren't just waiting on them. You have a healthy attraction and are letting it sit, not committing unless you find something better.\nWaiting to me, just sounds like unhealthy behaviour. To me there is quite the distinction from waiting and continuing life while keeping your options open." ]

[ "And if persons A & B get married, have kids and live out their lives?", ">\n\nOf course not forever- just when its a relationship not a marriage", ">\n\nSure, if somehow person C doesn't actually try anything that I'm not confidant of. But also it's just a sad way to live your life in my opinion if B didn't choose you just go live your life and IMO don't look for a relationship the best ones start out naturally.", ">\n\nTbh yes it is a sad way to live your life but ultimately it is Person C's choice & I'm just saying that Person C shouldn't be bashed at for waiting", ">\n\nAgain as long as they don't try to undermine the realtionship sure no blame.", ">\n\nNo. Person C is being selfish as they are waiting and hoping for another relationship which could very well be healthy and stable to end.\nSo yeah it is their choice, but that does not mean I support their reasoning. I mean, its like saying someone is hoping for my wife and I to divorce because they believe it's their destiny to be with her and thus will \"wait\" for her.", ">\n\nIt is even worse if A & B are married, instead of some hormonal high school crush.", ">\n\nThe likelihood that Person C wasn't flirting or otherwise sabotaging the relationship at least in some minor fashion on a subconcious level is pretty low. You don't just stand around pining after someone, hoping and praying they break up with their SO and not have that spill over into your behavior.\nPerson C should distance themselves if they actually respect the relationship or be honest about their feelings to that Person A can set whatever boundaries they deem appropriate.", ">\n\nYes then even if Person C distances themselves but still decides to wait- then there's nothing wrong with it", ">\n\nI mean, it's morally questionable to be standing around hoping someone else's relationship fails and says nothing positive about Person C as an individual.\nLike sure, as long as Person C distanced themselves and therefore wasn't really around Person A anyways then they're not to blame for any break up. But \"didn't help break a couple up\" is a pretty low bar to set for being a good person.", ">\n\nOkay, I’ll bite - I disagree.\nIt’s healthier for everyone (including C) if person C does their own thing. There’s a big difference between ‘if we’re ever both single at the same time, I’ll shoot my shot’ and ‘I am waiting and hoping that A becomes single.’", ">\n\nI mean sure, but its a bit stupid. Theres no thing that says A & B will break up or that A will like person C and hook up or whatever next.\nIts like friendzoning, it is a thing, its not bad--people can and do develop feelings for their friend all the time, hell people fuck their coworkers despite the advice just because they work and spend a lot of time together and shit just starts going that way; but you have to know boundaries and how to control your feelings and have expectations about it", ">\n\nWaiting is bad, keeping your options open is not.\nYou seem to be conflating the two in my opinion.", ">\n\nHow so?", ">\n\nWaiting implies you are not pursuing other relationships. You are obsessed, in an unhealthy way about someone who is not available and wants a relationship with them.\nKeeping your options open on the other hand, you still would love a chance to pursue a relationship with the individual, but you aren't just waiting on them. You have a healthy attraction and are letting it sit, not committing unless you find something better.\nWaiting to me, just sounds like unhealthy behaviour. To me there is quite the distinction from waiting and continuing life while keeping your options open.", ">\n\nIt is healthier for \"C\" to just remain friends with \"A\" and \"B\" and go on being open to other relationships. Obsessing about getting INTO a relationship after waiting for A&B to fail is emotionally unhealthy." ]

[]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence..." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas …." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?", ">\n\nWhat do you mean by \"run forever\", exactly?" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?", ">\n\nWhat do you mean by \"run forever\", exactly?", ">\n\nThey need to be more efficient and burn up the waste existing. And don't build on Earthquake Bay California." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?", ">\n\nWhat do you mean by \"run forever\", exactly?", ">\n\nThey need to be more efficient and burn up the waste existing. And don't build on Earthquake Bay California.", ">\n\nDude the reactors in California were build on-top of faults to prove how strong they are, they are designed to absorb major earthquakes." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?", ">\n\nWhat do you mean by \"run forever\", exactly?", ">\n\nThey need to be more efficient and burn up the waste existing. And don't build on Earthquake Bay California.", ">\n\nDude the reactors in California were build on-top of faults to prove how strong they are, they are designed to absorb major earthquakes.", ">\n\nThis plant was closed due to it's unmanageable infrastructure flaws and design. S.O.N.G.S was unable to keep itself cool and leaked profusely for over a decade. It had critical flaws and it is an easy terrorist target next to Camp Pendleton where they trained for Osama Bin Laden. Waste was stored in the parking lot for years during covid and is now buried on site next to the ocean. There have been many accidents here of personal. Read the article spit baller." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?", ">\n\nWhat do you mean by \"run forever\", exactly?", ">\n\nThey need to be more efficient and burn up the waste existing. And don't build on Earthquake Bay California.", ">\n\nDude the reactors in California were build on-top of faults to prove how strong they are, they are designed to absorb major earthquakes.", ">\n\nThis plant was closed due to it's unmanageable infrastructure flaws and design. S.O.N.G.S was unable to keep itself cool and leaked profusely for over a decade. It had critical flaws and it is an easy terrorist target next to Camp Pendleton where they trained for Osama Bin Laden. Waste was stored in the parking lot for years during covid and is now buried on site next to the ocean. There have been many accidents here of personal. Read the article spit baller.", ">\n\nIs this about drawing from our helium stockpile?" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?", ">\n\nWhat do you mean by \"run forever\", exactly?", ">\n\nThey need to be more efficient and burn up the waste existing. And don't build on Earthquake Bay California.", ">\n\nDude the reactors in California were build on-top of faults to prove how strong they are, they are designed to absorb major earthquakes.", ">\n\nThis plant was closed due to it's unmanageable infrastructure flaws and design. S.O.N.G.S was unable to keep itself cool and leaked profusely for over a decade. It had critical flaws and it is an easy terrorist target next to Camp Pendleton where they trained for Osama Bin Laden. Waste was stored in the parking lot for years during covid and is now buried on site next to the ocean. There have been many accidents here of personal. Read the article spit baller.", ">\n\nIs this about drawing from our helium stockpile?", ">\n\nIs it theoretically possible to have a small self contained nuclear reactor the size of a portable generator, that can power a house for 30 years without any new fuel?" ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?", ">\n\nWhat do you mean by \"run forever\", exactly?", ">\n\nThey need to be more efficient and burn up the waste existing. And don't build on Earthquake Bay California.", ">\n\nDude the reactors in California were build on-top of faults to prove how strong they are, they are designed to absorb major earthquakes.", ">\n\nThis plant was closed due to it's unmanageable infrastructure flaws and design. S.O.N.G.S was unable to keep itself cool and leaked profusely for over a decade. It had critical flaws and it is an easy terrorist target next to Camp Pendleton where they trained for Osama Bin Laden. Waste was stored in the parking lot for years during covid and is now buried on site next to the ocean. There have been many accidents here of personal. Read the article spit baller.", ">\n\nIs this about drawing from our helium stockpile?", ">\n\nIs it theoretically possible to have a small self contained nuclear reactor the size of a portable generator, that can power a house for 30 years without any new fuel?", ">\n\nNo. Theoretically you might be able to build that reactor the size of a house and power of house for 30 years. But a portable generator is way too small to fit in all the components and the fuel for 30 years of operation. Best you could do in the size of a generator is an RTG like they use on Mars rovers which will decrease in output over time and will at best output a few hundred watts." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?", ">\n\nWhat do you mean by \"run forever\", exactly?", ">\n\nThey need to be more efficient and burn up the waste existing. And don't build on Earthquake Bay California.", ">\n\nDude the reactors in California were build on-top of faults to prove how strong they are, they are designed to absorb major earthquakes.", ">\n\nThis plant was closed due to it's unmanageable infrastructure flaws and design. S.O.N.G.S was unable to keep itself cool and leaked profusely for over a decade. It had critical flaws and it is an easy terrorist target next to Camp Pendleton where they trained for Osama Bin Laden. Waste was stored in the parking lot for years during covid and is now buried on site next to the ocean. There have been many accidents here of personal. Read the article spit baller.", ">\n\nIs this about drawing from our helium stockpile?", ">\n\nIs it theoretically possible to have a small self contained nuclear reactor the size of a portable generator, that can power a house for 30 years without any new fuel?", ">\n\nNo. Theoretically you might be able to build that reactor the size of a house and power of house for 30 years. But a portable generator is way too small to fit in all the components and the fuel for 30 years of operation. Best you could do in the size of a generator is an RTG like they use on Mars rovers which will decrease in output over time and will at best output a few hundred watts.", ">\n\nNot for a small reactor surely? They will need at least 19% enriched to run at all. Previous small designs have been about 45%." ]

[ "Small modular reactors are going to happen, and not soon enough.\nThey are about 10ft in diameter and 80ft tall, and can power roughly 60,000 homes each. They are vastly cheaper and faster to construct.\nFor those who don't know: all the fissile waste generated in ALL OF THE US since the 1960s can fit on a football field with a depth of 10 yards.\nThe argument about fissile waste is overblown.", ">\n\n\nSmall modular reactors are going to happen\n\nTheir market potential is going to get crushed by a combination of dirt cheap renewables and dirt cheap grid storage, both of which are getting cheaper much faster than SMRs are ever likely to.\nThey’ll probably end up in some niche use cases where some combination of factors make renewables unworkable in an area, but not as the main source of electricity.", ">\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that. \nI don’t disagree with you’re long term outlook. Nuclears likely to end up too expensive to be the long term solution but I think we probably see 10-20 SMRs (not sites but units) built in the 30s with grid scale storage maybe in the 40s", ">\n\n\nI dunno if cheap enough grid storage is going to get here fast enough for that.\n\nThe cost of grid storage fell by 90% in ten years. It’s getting exponentially cheaper over time, already, today. \nThat’s many, many, many times faster than the cost of SMRs is going down—arguably SMRs are just getting more expensive over time anyway. \nSMRs (at least on Earth) will end up being a fairly irrelevant footnote due to the timing.", ">\n\nCost effectiveness of SMRs doesn't make sense to me.\nWouldn't SMRs wind up costing more than a regular nuclear plant because of economy of scale? Even if the units themselves prove cheaper to produce, they will be more expensive to install and operate due to fixed costs being spread over a small amount of power generation.\nThat's bad news for what is already the most expensive form of power in the world.", ">\n\nNo, economies of scale is one of the reasons why SMRs make sense. Until now, every single nuclear power plant has basically been designed from scratch. When you can churn out standardized reactors, costs come down.", ">\n\nYes, it makes sense for building reactors, but not for operating or installing them. Now, instead of one building with 2 or 4 large reactors, I have to build multiple buildings, and have staff for them all.", ">\n\nModular design means standardized inspection and maintenance. If they are designed with several layers of safety, having a huge staff on site is likely unnecessary. Security is another concern though.\nAlso, putting production closer to load is a no brainer. Something like half of energy produced is lost in transmission.\nIMO, groups of SMRs is probably the best bet. That way you can have people monitoring more production, have a rotating scheduled maintenance and not impact grid stability.", ">\n\nI'm not disagreeing with your thoughts, but still not seeing the economy of scale here.\nI didn't say you need a huge staff. But if you have 4 buildings instead of one, now you need 4 janitors instead of say, 2. That's twice the cost.\nAnd instead of 1 shift supervisor, you need 4. Instead of 3 maintenance techs per shift you need 4 or 8. Etc. etc.\nEconomies of scale work in two ways: spreading fixed costs over a larger asset, and taking advantage of staff being able to cover more work.\nWhen you spread out the production, you lose those advantages and run into the opposite. Fixed costs get multiplied, you have minimum staffing limits that you can't go below, so you wind up having more staff doing the same or less work.\nYes, the building of the reactors will decrease, but that doesn't seem likely to defray the other costs. Many of your upfront costs will be cheaper, but your operating costs are much higher. The longer you use the reactor, the less you save.\nPeak savings is building and never using the reactor. It only gets worse the more you use it.", ">\n\nWhenever I see meetings between Japan and other countries, I can’t help but notice the age and gender diversity in the other country’s panel while the Japanese panel is all old men.", ">\n\nRemember when the old conservative prime minister stepped down and was replaced by the even older and more conservative dude who trained him.", ">\n\nPepperidge farms remember that", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nGood news - everyone", ">\n\nYou should have added 'everyone' in your sentence...", ">\n\nJapan is both technology advanced and yet stuck in 1990s in some technical areas ….", ">\n\nI mean, can you blame a country that was nuked twice and had a nuclear meltdown for being a little wary of nuclear power?", ">\n\nIt's not even the nuclear stuff, there are a lot of companies in Japan that still rely on fax machines. Many legal documents and contracts (like buying a house) are signed using a special carved seal called a 'hanko stamp' instead of a personal or electronic signature.\nAt the same time, their public transportation system and train system are the best I've ever seen. Miss your train? Just wait five minutes for the next one. It will arrive on time down to the second, every time.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5", ">\n\nSo you mean they will actually work and run forever?", ">\n\nWhat do you mean by \"run forever\", exactly?", ">\n\nThey need to be more efficient and burn up the waste existing. And don't build on Earthquake Bay California.", ">\n\nDude the reactors in California were build on-top of faults to prove how strong they are, they are designed to absorb major earthquakes.", ">\n\nThis plant was closed due to it's unmanageable infrastructure flaws and design. S.O.N.G.S was unable to keep itself cool and leaked profusely for over a decade. It had critical flaws and it is an easy terrorist target next to Camp Pendleton where they trained for Osama Bin Laden. Waste was stored in the parking lot for years during covid and is now buried on site next to the ocean. There have been many accidents here of personal. Read the article spit baller.", ">\n\nIs this about drawing from our helium stockpile?", ">\n\nIs it theoretically possible to have a small self contained nuclear reactor the size of a portable generator, that can power a house for 30 years without any new fuel?", ">\n\nNo. Theoretically you might be able to build that reactor the size of a house and power of house for 30 years. But a portable generator is way too small to fit in all the components and the fuel for 30 years of operation. Best you could do in the size of a generator is an RTG like they use on Mars rovers which will decrease in output over time and will at best output a few hundred watts.", ">\n\nNot for a small reactor surely? They will need at least 19% enriched to run at all. Previous small designs have been about 45%.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nJapan and the United States agreed Monday to strengthen bilateral cooperation on developing next-generation nuclear reactors during ministerial talks on energy.\nAccording to a joint statement, Japan and the United States will step up cooperation in developing and constructing next-generation advanced reactors, including small modular reactors, \"Within each country and third countries.\"\nThe Japanese government said last month in a change from its post-Fukushima crisis nuclear energy policy that it may renew old nuclear reactors if necessary.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: energy^#1 reactor^#2 nuclear^#3 Japan^#4 Nishimura^#5" ]

[]

[ "I don't believe this for a second but what does it matter anyway? If Mike Lee goes down in scandal, they'll just order another mass produced model to come in and say the same bullshit they've been saying for my entire life - immigrants bad, democrats bad, tax cuts for the wealthy great. \nFor the life of me, I still can't wrap my head around the idea that of all the states in the union, somehow Utah is the one who solved homelessness but elect people like Mike Lee who would donate both testicles to do bad things to poor people." ]

[]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"..." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!", ">\n\nSounds like the plot of a Rob Schneider movie." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!", ">\n\nSounds like the plot of a Rob Schneider movie.", ">\n\nThis summer, Rob Schneider is a stapler wearing underwear as a mask." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!", ">\n\nSounds like the plot of a Rob Schneider movie.", ">\n\nThis summer, Rob Schneider is a stapler wearing underwear as a mask.", ">\n\nWhatever. You’ll go see it." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!", ">\n\nSounds like the plot of a Rob Schneider movie.", ">\n\nThis summer, Rob Schneider is a stapler wearing underwear as a mask.", ">\n\nWhatever. You’ll go see it.", ">\n\nI know dammit" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!", ">\n\nSounds like the plot of a Rob Schneider movie.", ">\n\nThis summer, Rob Schneider is a stapler wearing underwear as a mask.", ">\n\nWhatever. You’ll go see it.", ">\n\nI know dammit", ">\n\nIt's literally never been easier to get a mask lol" ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!", ">\n\nSounds like the plot of a Rob Schneider movie.", ">\n\nThis summer, Rob Schneider is a stapler wearing underwear as a mask.", ">\n\nWhatever. You’ll go see it.", ">\n\nI know dammit", ">\n\nIt's literally never been easier to get a mask lol", ">\n\nThe most unbelievable part of this is the idea that the police bothered to find and arrest someone stealing stuff off people's porches. They usually can't be assed." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!", ">\n\nSounds like the plot of a Rob Schneider movie.", ">\n\nThis summer, Rob Schneider is a stapler wearing underwear as a mask.", ">\n\nWhatever. You’ll go see it.", ">\n\nI know dammit", ">\n\nIt's literally never been easier to get a mask lol", ">\n\nThe most unbelievable part of this is the idea that the police bothered to find and arrest someone stealing stuff off people's porches. They usually can't be assed.", ">\n\nMy guess is someone somewhere had a good idea of who it was and were able to just wait for him to do it again." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!", ">\n\nSounds like the plot of a Rob Schneider movie.", ">\n\nThis summer, Rob Schneider is a stapler wearing underwear as a mask.", ">\n\nWhatever. You’ll go see it.", ">\n\nI know dammit", ">\n\nIt's literally never been easier to get a mask lol", ">\n\nThe most unbelievable part of this is the idea that the police bothered to find and arrest someone stealing stuff off people's porches. They usually can't be assed.", ">\n\nMy guess is someone somewhere had a good idea of who it was and were able to just wait for him to do it again.", ">\n\nCaptain Underpants' Arch Nemesis, the Brown Stain Bandit." ]

[ "Arrrgh...they call me \"Skidmarks the Pirate\"", ">\n\n“Captain Skidmarks, were be this booty ye speak of?”", ">\n\nAr, it's down in Gravy Jones' Locker!", ">\n\nArghhhh. So much gravy be in this locker, nom nom nom nom nom nom nom.", ">\n\nWhy does it smell funny?", ">\n\nWhat a shit head", ">\n\nAt the beginning of the Covid lockdowns, I once saw a man that used his underwear as a mask in a grocery store, after being confronted by the store staff who required him to wear a mask. \nThe dude went to his beaten up truck and came back wearing his extremely dirty once-used-to-be a white underwear over his face. That encounter still haunts me from time to time!", ">\n\nThe right would rather literally eat shit and die than listen to a \"librul doctor\"...", ">\n\nThem: \"Here's a complimentary clean mask we'd like you to wear for the duration of your visit\"\nHim: \"Fuck that, hold my beer real quick. . .\"", ">\n\n\"Son, you got a panty on your head!\"\n\\~Raising Arizona", ">\n\nOne of my favorite comedies. Almost up there with A Fish Called Wanda. Close.", ">\n\n\"But, Ricky, where the fudge are we gonna get masks at this time a night?! Tell him, Julian!\"", ">\n\nGood, fuck this guy. People who steal packages are degenerate garbage, may he have a loonnnng prison sentence.\nYou don't know what you're stealing from people when you take packages.", ">\n\nAs someone who works in the post office, all packages are pretty much personalized. \nIt's 80% garbage with no resell value and really no value to anyone other than the person who ordered it. \nVery rarely will you find anything of value in a package. It's just not worth your time. Leave packages alone.", ">\n\nA unique disguise is a very poor disguise.", ">\n\nLike they're gonna think it was the guy in the $4,000 banana suit C,MON!", ">\n\nSounds like the plot of a Rob Schneider movie.", ">\n\nThis summer, Rob Schneider is a stapler wearing underwear as a mask.", ">\n\nWhatever. You’ll go see it.", ">\n\nI know dammit", ">\n\nIt's literally never been easier to get a mask lol", ">\n\nThe most unbelievable part of this is the idea that the police bothered to find and arrest someone stealing stuff off people's porches. They usually can't be assed.", ">\n\nMy guess is someone somewhere had a good idea of who it was and were able to just wait for him to do it again.", ">\n\nCaptain Underpants' Arch Nemesis, the Brown Stain Bandit.", ">\n\n\"We have Hentai Kamen at home.\"" ]