codellama

/

CodeLlama-70b-Instruct-hf

like 207

Follow

Code Llama 622

cc @osanseviero

Same question here. The blog shows both the instruction and python models are long context fine-tuned.

2048: https://huggingface.co./codellama/CodeLlama-70b-Instruct-hf/blob/5c0e18bec97099ebf50649c002631054e1b9725e/config.json#L13

Actually it should be 4096, it seems like the config.json is wrong (the conversion script needs to be updated is my guess). I confirmed that with a Meta engineer, plus you can see that in the reference implementation - https://github.com/facebookresearch/codellama/blob/1af62e1f43db1fa5140fa43cb828465a603a48f3/llama/model.py#L277 (self.params.max_seq_len * 2 where self.params.max_seq_len == 2048).

The README says this is a model with 16k context, corroborating with turboderp's findings.

Code Llama is an auto-regressive language model that uses an optimized transformer architecture. It was fine-tuned with up to 16k tokens. This variant does not support long context of up to 100k tokens.

Altough I guess it could be wrong too.

@yard1 Thanks.

It's a real shame that the instruct and python versions were nerfed like this, but I guess 4096 is a better starting point than 2048 at least. :(

4096 for a coding model is painfully small.

Without 16k context length it is basically useless as a coding model.

I guess we need to wait for the instruct fine-tuned 16k versions created by others. Maybe Phind will make one, we'll see.

I guess we need to wait for the instruct fine-tuned 16k versions created by others. Maybe Phind will make one, we'll see.

加油Phind

How come all the smaller models of the same series (34B, 13B, 7B) have a context length of 16k, but the largest one only 4k? Doesn't make much sense. Also all documentation states that these models were trained on 16k inputs. It looks most like a type in config.json. Which is also strange, like how come noone noticed/fixed it? Also everywhere they say it supports up to 100k context. Is that a theoretical maximum, or what?

@sbnc This model is quite outdated now, so who still cares!

I am new to the space so i was experimenting with different models. But probably you are right...