y2clutch / raw_transcripts /lecture_12.txt
elyx's picture
initial commit
dae990d
Good morning.
So welcome back.
Friday.
Monday.
We heard about stress.
Today we're going to talk about social bonding.
Before we kick off, I just want to remind everyone
about while you're doing this module, do keep checking your
anatomy.
So this is a page in the anatomy and your
guide.
So here's the web guide from lecture two.
There's a whole load of brain sections to memorise.
And here is where one of them goes by halfway
through, about halfway through this module.
Now a bit more.
So you keep playing with this.
Can you tell some easy ones in this?
Where's the cerebellum?
Where's the corpus callosum?
Where's the military bodies?
That's much harder, right?
So here's where it says Yeah.
What number?
Three bodies.
So if you thought that was the military bodies, well
done.
But this is the way.
Just keep testing yourself.
Where's the midbrain?
Where's the pons?
Where is the body?
Keep looking through this material.
As you go through this course, I'm going to provide
some new anatomy today.
That isn't the place to do with the hypothalamus picking
up on last week.
That story on Monday's lecture.
Okay.
So let's go to our slides.
So Monday's talk on stressed is quite negative most of
the time.
Stress is a part of our life.
You going to have to sit in exam for this
module.
That's inherently stressful.
But another key way in which our way in which
we deal with stress is part of that is our
friendship groups, our parents, our sisters and brothers.
All potentially killing all these people around us really help
as humans mitigate stress and other primates and some of
the species.
Here's an example of two types of what we might
call social bonding.
A parent with a child or two people who have
couple together romantically in the textbooks.
And the research on this topic of how do these
bonds form between these two groups.
This is known as affiliation, and we'll dive into that
in this lecture.
So there are many ways in which bonds form between
people of different species.
On the left at the top, down the top left
is humans holding hands.
In many cultures around the world, that's a way of
single signifying bonding.
Swans have an amazing kind of approach with their heads.
And I think the cutest one of all really is
the two old world monkeys who twine their tails together.
So these are the monkeys bond for life as partners.
And when they do that, they sit together with their
tails bound up.
You can go and see them in London Zoo.
They have, or at least the last time where the
London Zoo in the tropical house, they have two world
monkeys.
So these are these are some of the things we
see, but we don't there are groups studying humans or
a group studying monkeys, small number of groups.
But a lot of the time research has been done
on these animals is not rats, but actually voles.
Those turn out to be a fascinating story in terms
of our understanding of social bonding.
And for humans, what social bonding bonding is linked to
is love, the love we have for our parents, our
family, our friends, our partner, etc., and our children.
We don't know if these animals experience love, but they
have very similar biochemical effects in their brains to us.
And because we can study those in more detail, we
can understand that.
So I talk about social bonding in this lecture, but
the technical term is affiliation that encompasses the bonds between
individuals, partners who come together to produce children and the
parent parents that bond.
And look at the general process of that bonding in
the beginning part of this lecture and turn to the
parental bonds at the end.
So this I mentioned this this coupling up the social
bonding promotes adoption to the world.
You can cope better when you've got friends, to put
it another way, and stress, the social isolation which doesn't
occur is linked to a whole range of psychiatric disorders.
So it's an important endeavour in our society to improve
social bonding, really.
So here's the more of a longer and a bit.
One of the key things you need to learn in
this lecture is the word called specific to the ability
to recognise a specific.
So this is another species of the same of another
individual of your same species.
So as humans walking around, you can detect humans.
So you as the human, the most dangerous thing out
there for humans and most of their animals.
So you really do need to detect humans, but also
the most useful animal you probably interact with animals, I
imagine the vast majority of you.
So you need to be able to do that.
You don't really need to be able to recognise as
a human, but which humanism?
Who is it I'm recognising and then do I need
to remember to maintain a relationship with this person?
So this all comes under this bonding process of not
only do tend to find that is that is the
human.
I do know that human and I do need to
invest time with that humans.
So the there are a number of tasks that have
been used.
That's all fine in theory, but how do we test
that?
One is to look at approach.
So here are two dogs.
Dogs love to approach each other.
Are people that dog owners know this.
They love to get in and sniff each other's bottoms.
They do more than that.
They really get in there and get in there with
them with the urine and material to understand.
They do more than we do as humans.
They also need to learn to recognise and said who.
And there's a lot of work which cheap, cheap but
very, very similar to us humans.
But they have to identify the individual sheep they're interacting
with.
And again, that investment with sheep, how does the sheep
know its mother and how does the mother know which
individual lamb is its lamb to take care of?
And there's been research on that.
Now, how a lot of those animals do that is
through smell of action.
So in red highlighted that humans are a bit unusual
in other primates, that our visual system is so good
we can see people far off and we can hear
thing.
We can use that visual information to guide our social
interactions.
Not all other animals share that ability, and what they
do is use of actions that ferments.
You may be aware from popular culture are floating in
the air.
These are these are gas tight released chemicals that have
some role in humans, but most are important for other
species in terms of their their interrelationships.
But beyond you know, beyond that, we have a particular
organ in the brains of most vertebrates.
So we have here reptiles and mammals that's shown by
rats and a snake, and they have what's known as
a bomb or a nasal organ.
It detects in the air these, these pheromones I can
relay them to.
A particular bit of the brain illustrates that in both
species called the accessory olfactory bulbs.
So if you're smelling like a beautiful perfume, you'll likely
be using your main olfactory system to detect that process
that, Oh, this is lovely and it passes through your
factory system.
Separate to that main pathway is the access, the real
factory bulbs, and they're helpful for detecting those social cues
in these.
So they pass that information that's shown here to the
thalamus, that campus and the amygdala to various other bits
of the brain that we'll come see.
So this will really keep it to the brain to
do that.
Social detection, Who is this?
And that's what we're looking for, the vulnerable nasal organism,
very much in action in that picture.
The two dogs, humans don't seem to have a formal
gaze.
Morgana starts to develop in the womb when you're a
tiny baby and then gets regressed, it becomes removed.
You don't end up coming out of the womb with
the vulnerable base puts a set of eyes focussed on
it.
So the how do we test that?
Once we've got that detection, how do we how do
we explore that So it rodents and that's voles and
rats and mice.
And one approach is to take the top the two
to the top one is to take that rat, expose
it to another rat to play with.
The two rats will play with each other a bit.
I spent time in a board and run away into
it during sniffing and grooming.
If you put them back together a little bit later,
don't just ignore each other again.
They remember, Oh, it's this right?
But if they're given a new rat again, explore and
extending, you know, sniff each other and greet each other,
and all those things that rats do when they interact.
So you can measure that systematically how much times these
two animals interact with each other and use that as
a measure of social recognition.
So if you were to damage the ability to do
social recognition, a rat can't do that.
We just treat all rats as if they knew they
won't trust, will not know who it's mated with, who
is it's daughters or sons or in terms of rat
pups.
It would just it wouldn't have that ability.
So that's one way to measure it more.
Find ways to use a social discrimination procedure that's been
used extensively in bowls.
So put the test participant in the neutral middle chamber
with door flaps that can run through doorways into other
chambers.
What they'll do is have one.
Another animal on one of these is tethered, is a
little tether around its legs.
They can't escape that chamber.
Just briefly, for the purposes of a short experiment and
another chamber with another one with a little tether.
That's what shown here holding.
It's like they can't get into the middle chamber, an
experiment test whether the devil in the middle will spend
more time with the partner than it's mated with recently
might be.
Or it might be.
It could test lots of things, but typically it might
be a partner that the vole has mated with or
obviously spent a lot of time with to invest the
time with or completely unknown vole that it doesn't know,
or it could just hang out in the middle.
But what this this fascinating work, there's a review we
recommend you read in the reading material and so in
young which really explored all of this work was there
are two two different distinct species that probably more but
two distinct species of vole, a montane voles, a prairie
voles.
There they look almost identical, but they have different genetic
backgrounds and different environments.
Now what you can see is this time spent in
each of the chambers and we've colour coded these.
So the green period is the partner one, the neutral
one is the sort of purple one and the beige
one is the stranger.
So what you can see for Montane Voles is they
don't.
Let this go in the middle is just mated with
this other one, but it would rather spend time on
its own.
It's just going to spend time sitting here grooming, maybe
eating and doing what it wants to do, but it
doesn't really distinguish between the two other goals.
That's not true of prairie voles.
They're less likely than anywhere to be in the neutral
chamber, and they're very late to spend time with a
stranger.
What they spend most that time is with the partner
they've made up with each other.
That's helpful.
So this shows these two different species that look very
similar, have very different social behaviours.
And as you can see in the wild, these, these
variables will mate and the bond and they'll spend time
together and they'll snuggle up.
If I go right back to this early picture.
That's two prairie voles together with their offspring.
And they really co-invest and raise those offspring together.
So that's one way.
So what's different with these these voles?
What's different between montane and prairie voles?
And this review goes into this in a lot of
detail.
And so for this lecture and we've got 40 minutes,
I'm just going to highlight a key takeaway message, and
that is when you look at the brains of Montane
voles and prairie voles is a particular molecule or two
particular molecules that appear to be different.
Oxytocin, the vasopressin, come on to explain those in the
next slide.
So these two molecules are much more abundant.
They have many more receptors in key areas of the
brain for motivation in prairie voles than they do in
montane voles.
So what's going on?
So they discovered this.
What's going on?
Why these molecules?
Well, the next experimental thing is for scientists to do
is let's manipulate that.
What if we were to inject these voles with oxytocin?
What happens if we boost it artificially?
Or what if we knock it out by giving a
drug that stops them working?
A lot of that painstaking work over decades of research,
lots of graphs, statistics, publications, somebody just put it together
in a cartoon slide to explain a lot of billions
of US dollars being spent.
What you're looking at the top is two voles.
And what brought to this picture to me, but they're
mainly work is work is on voles.
And what they'll do is what this thing at the
top is.
Normally this slide would be even clearer, is that typically
the two would be the thing with love with each
other for the diagram.
But the top one, the male profile has been injected
with very suppresses and he hasn't before mating.
So the two the two goals here typically ignore each
other.
In this first instance, they don't know each other that
strangers.
If we go back to that previous slide, this is
this state here.
The stranger doesn't care, the verbal.
But what they've done in this experiment is inject visa
pressing into the male.
Now he keeps trying to snuggle up to the female,
but what does she do?
She runs off.
She doesn't know.
She's not interested in it.
And so that's what this diagram, this this illustration is
sort of looking away.
What is this male sorry to do here?
What if they inject oxytocin into the female?
You get the same effect the other way round.
Now the female is trying to couple up with the
male, but the male is confused and running off.
Normally, if they mated together, they would both show higher
vasopressin oxytocin levels, but they're not.
So this showing that you can boost this bonding process
just by injecting one chemical that turns out to be
very depressing for male voles and oxytocin for female voles.
They're different.
They work slightly different in these two species and humans.
It's a more mixed picture.
It isn't that simple for other animals, but for voles,
it turns out to be these two, this to just
this way.
Right?
So the problem here is that's the period before.
This is about confusing the animals, artificially boosting bonding when
it hasn't happened down at the bottom is saying they
have mated.
Now, these two, those should have enough eyes for each
other and be snuggled up.
And that's indeed what the female is doing after mating
here.
But they've injected an antagonist, a blocker agent pervasive present
in the male and that he's not wanting to couple
up and bond.
So they've turned off his natural inclination to snuggle up
with the female and invest time with her just by
injecting one chemical change this entire behaviour and then they
find they can do the exact same thing with the
female just using oxytocin antagonist.
They've blocked oxytocin after meeting in the female and now
she's sort of in this illustration telling him he's a
loser and he should get lost in this illustration to
highlight what the scientists are inferring because is much more
biological than then.
To this, what's going on?
Let's turn to the anatomy now.
Let's turn to the human brain.
The brain is sitting at this lecture theatre in front
of me.
And so here's a here's a sagittal section through the
human brain.
You can see the pons and the midbrain and so
on.
And if we zoom in on this bit underneath the
corpus callosum, we have the thalamus in the middle here.
Here we have a region of the brain underneath the
thalamus called the hypothalamus, and we learned about it in
lecture last Monday going on stress.
We talked about the anterior pituitary previously as the output
of the stress hormones, a hormone that goes in activates
the adrenal cortical to growth hormone from the anterior.
Now we're going to look at the posterior pituitary.
The anterior is involved in stress.
The posterior is involved in that building process.
So what the scientists discovered, looking at the voles and
then exploring in humans, is that there's a particular nucleus,
the power of ventricular nucleus.
It's very similar in your brain as a mammal to
evolved, very similar.
It just sits next to a bit ventricles.
That's the reason that gets his name.
There's also a super optic nucleus just above the optic
plasma.
That's where it gets its name from.
So these two nuclei have nothing to do with ventricles
or optic fibre optic pathways.
It's just the name comes from where they're located in
the brain, but they're tiny nuclei.
They have more than five cells.
This illustrations obviously schematic, but these are these are the
bodies with cells that act with dendrites and they have
axons, a good tone and an interface onto the blood
cell, the blood, the circulation system, the capillaries.
And they release, as is shown here, oxytocin, invasive breast
and into the bloodstream from the Stewart the posterior pituitary
gland.
So typically this is what's known as neuroendocrine communication.
So here we have our classic sounds of them and
talked about in lecture three about sign ups, this and
the transmitter systems.
You also have endocrine responses in your body where you
have hormones that operate here, like puberty is driven by
our hormones.
Here.
What we're talking about is this other third pathway where
you've got neurones that are connecting into the blood and
releasing.
This is known as neuroendocrine function.
And that's how this this process is occurring.
Now, this slide takes us on the journey from voles
in a lab and injecting them to humans rather than
injecting humans.
They will take a nasal infusion of oxytocin into people's
nose and get it through circulating up into the brain.
And then what they found is that there's a whole
range of different experiments.
But one is that to show that oxytocin changes the
way in which we treat faces, it's been a bit
controversial.
There's, you know, trying to get these expressed.
Replicate can vary because not everyone reacts.
Some people are really good at facial detection and others
not so good.
And these individual differences can be a challenge.
But overall, the evidence weights the oxytocin and upregulate your
ability for social processing.
So detecting people, treating a neutral face is a slightly
more positive game.
Experiments where you have to trust other people to solve
problems apparently are sort of elevated by oxytocin.
But here's an experiment shown here by DOMS without biological
psychiatry where they injected a placebo, so nothing going into
the body or oxytocin or not injected these infusion again.
And you can see, going back to Solomon's lectures, the
amygdala responses to angry faces in the placebo condition is
really high.
There's an emotional response basically to these against the neutral
faces.
But what you see is that this is dampened so
you get less reactivity, too fearful or angry, but in
fact happy faces.
So the whole thing sort of reactivity in the amygdala
is lowered.
That means that you're more likely to approach people, you're
more likely to engage in activities of behaviours.
That bonding process is what's argued by these authors.
And there's a review in 2009 in Frontiers in neuro
and chronology.
So just to take that from a lab experiment, injecting
people in the lab looking at brain scans is a
real world example like I gave in the Fitbit on
Monday.
This is a couple of Nick Fleming and Linda Gaddis,
who had their blood molecules, had their blood circulation taken.
Here's Linda.
Having her blood extracted on her wedding day, consented to
a centrifuge and examined out her wedding alongside her husband,
their parents, for their close friends and various people.
And this is a wedding I actually attended.
So is that what you're going to write it up
for?
The Daily Mail?
So this became known as the cuddle, the cuddle chemical
oxytocin in the study.
And what is this?
This just highlights the kind of thing that would occur.
And this is to give a real life example.
A month later, after the wedding, Linda got an email
from Zach, the research scientist.
And to her delight, the predictions were correct over oxytocin.
Her husband Nick, and her experienced rise in the the
love hormone with the cuddle chemical or oxytocin during the
ceremony and the mother of the bride, the father and
the relatives, they all boosted.
But the friends were more mixed to experience the rise.
But five didn't.
Perhaps they were not feeling the love.
So that's the way the Daily Mail has covered this
kind of research.
And you should be sceptical.
Be careful about overinterpreting.
This is the love molecule.
It's a molecule that is raised and you can see
that that actually does fit the predictions that these these
molecules will rise in a small sample in a very
particular scenario.
But it's a very well studied phenomenon.
The rise in oxytocin relates to social bonding, but it
does more than that.
So there's a really nice article called Oxytocin, the Great
Facilitator of Life.
And we're looking at this period here, social recognition, and
we've been talking about social bonding and mate choice and
feeling of trust and recognising social partners and children involved
in play, but it's also involved in a whole lot
of things that enable, as you can see here, through
sexual behaviour, dampening aggression, potentially unintended childbirth, raising children, tiny
babies through lactation and improper parenting is the mother right
through.
So they've argued this this whole cycle of life or
maintenance as a species is somewhat dependent on oxytocin functioning.
But it's not the only one like oxytocin works with
others.
There's things like serotonin and adrenaline.
To all these molecules you need.
Oxytocin appears to play this great, facilitative process that improves
and enhances all these things.
So that's the first part of the lecture I'm now
going to focus.
I've been talking about the bonding process here.
I'm not going to look at this bit parenting, what
happens in maternal and paternal behaviours.
There's a really great review.
It's quite sure maybe four pages by Dulac and colleagues
in science from 2014 on the Moodle page is also
a short 15 minute video.
The Catherine du Lac is one of the best researchers
in the world on this.
Just talks through the camera about parenting process and what
she's uncovered in her work and various prestigious institutes and
what they've been able to do.
It is absolutely remarkable when we dive into this work.
So what they've shown in this work is that parenting
occurs in a surprisingly large variety of vertebrates and invertebrates
insects, arachnids, molluscs, fish recipients, reptiles, birds and of course,
mammals.
We've been talking about I've been talking about mammals all
the way through here.
But you have beetles that carry around their young.
You have frogs that occur after they're young, you have
birds and of course birds.
And the most classic thing is birds.
They have to look after their nests with their eggs
in it.
They have to pay it.
Young, bring them food when they hatch.
And so so there's a lot of analysis of parenting.
The most common form of parenting is its female unit,
parental.
That means that the female is giving birth to the
young and takes the majority of the role in raising
that young.
The male may lost.
She's responsible and that accounts for that.
And that's, as noted here, to carry the offspring.
She has them.
But there are many species that show this by parental
care.
Birds are amazing.
When 90% of birds are shown in examples here, both
parents are involved in raising the young.
And that's partly to do with the one of them
sitting on the eggs and looking after them.
But the challenge of bringing food in for their offspring
means the birds are particularly, you know, we'll spend a
lot of co-investment.
But that's also true of snakes and reptiles in some
cases.
Then they share this.
But there are also some species of bird important to
be aware of where there's a male unique parents.
Also stickleback fish or a good example.
And seahorses are not shown here, but they show particular
male that the female will lay the eggs, but the
male will then take over the role of raising those
young to the point at which they're they grow up
and become independent.
So it's quite fascinating.
So what's what's the takes on this new lots of
different species here.
But one of the conclusions of studying them in Europe
biologically is that there appear to be across beetles to
the to the stickleback fish through the reptiles and amphibians
here, all the way through birds and mammals at the
top are highly conserved, antagonistic circuits.
What I mean by antagonistic these things don't work together.
They are on or off.
You can't be doing this and that.
They are antagonistic in controlling either the activity of social
bonding, parental behaviour, or aggressive behaviour towards offspring.
And adult animals can display parental care or aggression according
to their physiological state.
Are they ready to do that?
And what is the environment?
So it's a combination of that.
So these are these are statements.
These are course conclusions that come from that review, and
we'll dive into those in a moment.
But it's worth being aware, we live in quite a
civilised vertical society that if you step out of the
door, you're not going to see a huge amount of
aggression, I hope, today.
But I have to go back more than 200 years
and you would see a lot of aggression in humans
and there is a lot of aggression in other parts
of the world.
Very sadly, there are wars going on.
We are quite violent species.
But that's also true of a lot of other mammals
and other species.
There's a lot of fighting for survival out there, and
that requires that fighting and obtaining the the nutrients and
the food and water you need requires aggression.
You have to fight for things, for survival that Lucian
has built into the brain of these mammals and other
other vertebrates.
Aggressive behaviour to survive.
But whether they're aggressive or caring depends on the situation.
So this is a graph from that paper that'll take
a little while to unpack.
So what we can see here and explain the y
axis, first of all, this y axis, and this comes
from a this review.
As I said, here's some quick actions.
If you look at the Y axis is what percentage
of a group of male laboratory mice, these are males
who are virgin as and they're not they're not mated
previously.
And they're previously this is this is a graph after
those male cf1 strain mice have first and they're like
mated.
So they have mated.
They're not going to have offspring.
And what it shows you in the initial period before
or just after that is the natural behaviour.
This is what most male male mice will do, and
this is quite similar to a lot of other rodent
species and other mammals.
Lions, for example, BE The classic example is that most
of the time, given the opportunity, if that mice finds
another unprotected pup in other mice, it will attack it,
it'll destroy it.
It's, it's trying to unless it's a pup, it won't,
it will treat it with attack.
It might ignore it in many cases.
Occasionally it might retrieve that pup.
There might be social circumstances under which it gets activated
to help retrieve that problem.
But you can see just in the spirit this fluctuates
from here.
80% of all the male mice to looking at Habitat,
the men being given this experiment just a few days
after mating.
But then there's a radical shift in these male mice.
His brain.
Something is switching off that aggressive circuit, and it dropped
to 10% of them are attacking and 80% of them
are switching to retrieving pups.
That can't be their own pups because they've just mated.
But it will be other pups they find scattered in
the environment.
And that slowly declines and is a shift after about
60 days.
And the idea is that they're.
Is a rapid a period where they need to avoid
attacking to support the female.
But after that period isn't that they will typically be
left that scenario and they'll be back to their standard
state and switching.
So what we get out of this experiment, is it
really true?
Is it real physiological change induced by that process of
mating?
And so we can see a similar pattern to what's
going on here in wild female mice.
But that doesn't happen in laboratory female mice, intriguingly, that
sort of they've been bred to be a bit more
docile and nicer to pups.
That's what ends up being used in lab experiments.
They're not as aggressive.
So what causes that?
So this is a great grass in Davidson, could be
in the wild watching this and describing it and say,
Wow, look at this.
Amazing behaviour is a remarkable behaviour we can see in
the animal kingdom.
But you're not in nature show.
You're in a neurobiology lecture.
Why?
Why do we get this?
Well, what these scientists have done their research is this
their time dependent?
So in that process, synaptic changes to the sign ups
as there have a changing in those male mice brains
and rest transcriptional.
So that's within the DNA you're having different readout of
the genes is a change in gene expression and triggered
by that mating process.
So that mating process causes the release of different chemical
cues that change that.
And some of them are released by females during pregnancy,
can drive that radical behaviour shift from killing to parenting.
What they found is if you disrupt the verbal maze
Logan in wild male virgin males, it will reduce that
process.
If I go back to that graph here, you took
a mouse, take a group of mice and you disrupt
their vulnerable needs.
Logan They normally would attack, but the ones we don't
have the capacity to detect those cues drop down.
They start behaving as if they mated.
They're no longer detecting the signals that cause them to
attack.
So that formalised logic is not just useful for going,
oh, detecting your friends or your children, but detecting strangers
for the mice.
Why they attacking these pups?
Is it trying to preserve their own particular gene pool
of their own genes?
If they can make the mouse, the male mice can
maybe all the other female mice and it can have
its offspring grow up.
The best thing it can do is kill off the
other competitors children.
And again, there are lots of other mammals that do
this.
Lions or the famous example, it will kill a new
line and just the bride takes it will kill the
the cubs from the other lions.
That happens to be in that pride.
But you also see these going to patterns and berry
burying beetles.
So not just vertebrates and lots of birds.
The changes in the female are more varied.
So you have the well known features to do with
oestrogen.
Progesterone and prolactin are all three hormones that circulate through
the body in females during pregnancy that change that maternal
behaviour in males.
There's also testosterone very familiar culturally with the idea of
testosterone is linked to aggression.
It regulates a lot of that is very high in
the males and it can be reduced in fathers to
produce less aggressive behaviour.
But of course this varies.
I always remember all these things vary between people.
That graph shows you this.
There are some, you know, some animals, some of these
males after after mating, they're still attacking and killing and
there are some before they mated that are not doing
that.
So just be aware.
There's a lot of variation out there too.
Now, I've written on this slide down memory you do
not need for the exam to memorise the layout and
the interconnections of all these nuclei.
That's not what this is about.
This is a this is a figure four from that
really great review.
What you need to take away for this second module
is that there are two of these circuits.
One circuit is involved in parental care and one circuit.
This involves an aggression, so particularly violence towards other strangers
and pups.
And the important point here is that these two circuits
are linked.
You can see the accessory olfactory bulb.
That's the pathway you heard in the slide three where
I talked about the vulnerable days and going to this
area.
And it projects into the aggressive aggression circuit.
And if you damage that that circuit, it won't get
turned on as much.
They're not going to show as much aggression.
The here we have another circuit involved in parental care
that can get switched on.
And instead they have they have these two interacting circuits.
So they will, if one is on the axons from
these brain areas, will terminate.
And a lot of these other is to shut them
down.
They'll be negative impact and vice versa because you can't
be both aggressive parenting at the same time.
That's just because you just can't do the two different
behaviours.
So you notice to you there are a lot of
other brain areas we come across.
We've got here various areas in the amygdala that are
important for Christmas, think parental care and we've got the
prefrontal.
Text.
It's receiving and sending information back in.
And you have again to remind you have a lecture
at the end of the course and what the prefrontal
cortex is doing by Professor Paul Burgess.
So we come back to that.
You can hold on to this for the moment that
the prefrontal cortex, it shows a modulatory control in a
lot of behaviour.
One of them is the the exertion of parental control.
So these two circuits exist and they they're antagonistic.
What do we know about them?
Is that the aversive circuit?
First of all, that that red one is dominant.
It's the one in charge most of the time in
female virgin rats and male virgin rats.
We talked about in lab female rats, mice and rats.
The same sort of idea here that can can be
quite docile.
But generally that aggressive circuit is long.
It will it will lead them to survive more.
The aggression will save them as a as a rodent
post-partum.
So after mating and the desensitisation that occurs with in
females, there's this hormonal neuro modulatory experience dependent factors that
activate that, that other affiliated circuit that also acts to
silence that that that the circuit, the one that does
the aggression and avoidance.
So just to highlight here it does this this is
the avoidance and aggression.
I've mainly talked about fighting, doing things, but this circuit
is also important for just ignoring, running right, just not
caring all these behaviours that again, are part of survival
for for mice and rats.
As part of us walks the toasting we talked about.
That is really key in the initiation of that material
behaviour.
So we talked about if you inject these goals with
oxidation, they won't thorns, but they also won't treat their
children.
They won't do the licking and grooming that we heard
about under the stress lecture.
So it really is important for oxytocin to be to
be to be engaged for that.
There's an area we're going to talk about next week
in the detail of the ventral segmental area.
We spend a lot of time talking about that and
the molecules don't the mean and that's involved.
It's a state just at this point, this brain areas
involved in initiating this process and maintaining the behavioural maternal
behaviour.
So oxytocin is not shown here, but bonds on the
receptors in the ventral segmental area and the ventral segmental
areas you hear next week is the brain area that
motivates and drives animals to do things again and again.
So in this case, the drive here is that the
animal is the, the, the females to really spend time
investing with a the pups and be the partners.
So that brain area is key for drives initiating and
maintaining that behaviour.
We'll come on to how it does that for all
sorts of things.
So people, the things we get involved in are habits,
bad habits, Ferals that driven by this all depends on
the situation.
But beyond that there's also adrenaline and serotonin.
Serotonin.
These circuits are involved in maternal behaviours.
Just to highlight in this picture here you have these
various brain structures showing up here and these are the
areas, the rough and the locus to release these two
brain areas that release that involved in in regulating our
attention, our arousal and our focus.
These here appear to be part of that circuit that's
involved in paternal care.
And so these are also involved in that in that
process.
So just to end on, I'll talk through one experiment
that just gives a really good two experiments.
This one and the next one is a wrap up
today's lecture.
This is a figure from a news and Views article.
So Rodriguez are writing up, trying to explain this experiment.
But another group had done so.
What they did in this experiment to understand the maternal
paternal process for male and female is what's happening in
their brains.
And in this case they're looking at the medial pre
optic area of the hypothalamus.
So earlier on in this lecture, I showed you the
hypothalamus and I explained this like a number of different
nuclei within there.
One of these is called the medial pre optic area.
It's got nothing to do with optics.
It just happens to be next to the optic nerve.
So the medial pre optic area and after the animals
have mated, you tend to get activation of neurones in
this brain area.
They're not as active before, but they become activated after
mating this small bit of brain area.
And that's what's indicated here by the red neurones.
These are neurones that are sending out the highly active,
the sending out transmission, That transmission of those neurones of
the medial pre optic area they're arguing is driving that
parental behaviour.
And the reason they're finding these are critical is that
they can go in and they can deplete those neurones
just in that one tiny area.
You barely see it in the brain.
They've gone in and selectively damage those neurones by clever
chemical techniques.
But after that process you get no parental behaviour from
the female or the male remaining looking at female mice
and experienced male mice and experienced female mice.
Like I mentioned, it's the virgin males where you don't
get this pattern right.
These all show this, this.
If you damage this, you don't get this parental type
behaviours.
So that's the grooming, the retrieving pups and taking care
of them.
Okay, that's, that's one experiment to show it's important.
That's one way of doing it.
But ask these these four groups, virgin females, experienced males
who mated and experienced females and mated experience here is
little about mating on the right hand side.
Now, this is for me.
This is why this paper was published in science.
That first experiments.
Okay.
It damaged the brain.
They can't do it.
That's fine.
Very long.
Here is the kicker.
Experiment around.
From a scientific perspective, it was virgin male mice.
First of all, you can see they're not active.
These cells that are active in these all three other
categories of mice in the virgin males, they've not mated.
They're just like young, aggressive male mice who have not
made it yet.
And what do they show?
Aggression.
They attack.
They tap upset.
They get rid of them.
Here's what they did.
They went in and artificially using optogenetics, find those cells
that could be activated, activating and activate those cells by
shining the laser light onto the genetically tagged cells.
So what you can see is before and after that
light is this this is a couple of milliseconds.
You've got a normal functioning male.
You shine a light.
2 milliseconds later, a whole of the cells are turned
on.
What does it do?
So rather than running across the cage and attacking and
possibly trying to bite and destroy pop, it runs over,
it picks it up, puts it back in the nest.
So by just turning on a light, affecting a small
number of cells, more than the number of neurones in
this illustration here, but still you're talking about tiny cell
nucleus in a small part of the brain.
You switched one animal from showing this aggressive behaviour to
a whole different approach.
And it's really worth what's quite amazing about this is
it's not like you've improved motor function or its ability
to perceive light in some way.
You've changed the radical feature of its entire behaviour in
a millisecond.
You've with this experiment, they've turned to mice that would
attack and kill.
It's one artificially thinks it's mated effectively.
It's not thinking about this, but you've artificially activated a
parental circuit in an animal that's never undergone any change.
So this shows the power of the kind of optogenetics
approach of exploring behaviour.
So you got to ask, why did you use the
light?
How do you see through this activity?
Yes.
So optogenetics, as you heard in your lecture on the
methods lecture, remember that the methods, the techniques you learned
about what you could do is genetically tagged those cells
in these particular rats.
I think it is for mice in mice more likely
get mice.
They've gone and bred these animals with specific proteins that
are sensitive to the wavelengths of light.
When those wavelengths of light are show shot, shine down
on those cells through a cut in the top of
the brain of the rat, the mouse, they can artificially
turn them on and they can do it within a
couple of milliseconds.
And so you can have a rat, a mouse running
across the cage to attack and switch the behaviour in
an instant from attack to being attacking an aggressive and
killing to being attacked in milliseconds through one circuit interruption.
So what does that what makes that amazing is that
it's quite a complex behaviour you're looking at.
Now this is a experiment where they were looking at
another particular nucleus.
The this particular part, the AVP haven't read that, but
it's in this paper.
So this is a hypothalamic nucleus which differs between Virgin.
So a difference between males and females in virgins.
But what they showed is that this particular is not
just the nucleus involved with the particular subcategories of neurones
that can start to get to that.
You can regulate in the parents, the females.
So males after mating don't show a change here, but
the female mice can show a change in the number
of active neurones in this particular nucleus after mating.
So not only do you get these patterns of expression,
but you can get them in particular male or female
situations as well.
But it's worth going to watch these movies to see
the patterns of behaviour.
So in this link, if you don't follow it through,
you will see the use of optogenetics where you get
mice, which is not really fighting with each other, and
then they'll turn on these these neurones artificially and they
can do it in males as well.
So they can turn on the mouse.
Yes.
This is almost certain case.
Oh, yes.
But this is all about.
So if they might be right, they might not get
children from mice.
It's extremely likely their breeding capacity is way higher.
That's one of the reasons they've ended up being laboratory
animals that are really higher breeding.
They require fast turnover.
They can have children very quickly, but very likely they
would, but it's not dependent.
So these activation patterns are not dependent on the sex
success.
Well, I think you would need to activate pregnancy, though,
so if they don't end up being pregnant.
But I think the idea of the meeting alone will
activate patterns of change in the male, because they can't
detect that necessarily.
But to pick up on that point, when the female
does become pregnant, her pheromones secretions, what she's secreting, will
change.
And that provides a cue because humans, we don't really
dissect these things but might do dogs do.
They can detect other animals can smell these things.
We can't in the same way those they go and
watch these movies because you can see them turning off
again with the optogenetics and the midpoints to attack, making
an animal docile and parent and pick up a tree
pups.
It's it's really one of the most dramatic pieces of
evidence I've seen.
And again, one of the reasons it's published in the
most prestigious journal in the world in Nature.
So to wrap up today, there's a nice section in
the physiology of behaviour that calls in or brisket on
social bonding.
That review is really clear and really nice to read
into and Young.
I talked about the voles again, extremely easy to read
article and then there's some other reading.
If you're really interested you could look into This is
not essential, but we can go into that and we'll
see you next week.
The consciousness and motivation, why we do the things we
do.